• OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here in SK right now (yes it’s 4:30am), everyone’s against it but no one knows the data. Once people see the data they’re like “oh”.

    South Korea has an inherent hatred for Japan, so this isn’t surprising at all.

    • lntl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Japanese did some pretty radical things during the occupation. It’s interesting to see the ripple effects of these policies so far into the future.

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I keep hearing about this, but haven’t delved into it.

    Usually when they do a water release like this, or there’s potential for contamination to interact with humans in other matricies, such as metals on mines being uptaken in berries and plants used in traditional use (consumption by first Nations), they will do a Human Health and Environment Risk Assessment (HHERA).

    These HHERAs look at multiple exposure pathways and consider rates and likelihood of exposure. I find it hard to think that they didn’t do this step with something as dangerous as treated waste water from a nuclear plant.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    SEOUL, Aug 26 (Reuters) - Protesters gathered in the capital of South Korea on Saturday to demand that the government take steps to avoid what they fear is a looming disaster from Japan’s release of treated radioactive water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant.

    Japan began dumping the water from the plant north of Tokyo into the sea on Thursday despite objections both at home and abroad from fishing communities and others worried about the environmental impact.

    “We will not be immediately seeing disasters like detecting radioactive materials in seafood but it seems inevitable that this discharge would pose a risk to the local fishing industry and the government needs to come up with solutions,” said Choi Kyoungsook of the Korea Radiation Watch group that organised the rally.

    Japan and scientific organisations say the water, distilled after being contaminated by contact with fuel rods when the reactor was destroyed in a 2011 earthquake and tsunami, is safe.

    Japan’s fisheries agency said on Saturday that fish tested in waters around the plant did not contain detectable levels of tritium, Kyodo news service reported.

    Japan says it needs to start releasing the water as storage tanks holding about 1.3 million metric tons of it - enough to fill 500 Olympic-sized swimming pools - are full.


    The original article contains 319 words, the summary contains 213 words. Saved 33%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The country was nuked twice and hit with one of the worst nuclear disasters ever. I’m gonna go ahead and trust them with that water

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They aren’t dumping it. They dug miles of caves below the sea floor and are pumping the filtered water into the caves slowly over the span of decades. That’s why this whole thing is very dumb. Japan is taking enormous measures to do this safely.

  • socsa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This whole thing would legitimately be the stupidest story of the decade in any decade where Donald Trump isn’t making daily headlines.

  • lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Dumping is illegal where I live, you’ll get a fine ;)

    Jokes aside, does anyone with a chemistry/physics background know of a technical solution/alternative to dumping? I suspect Japan would not dump nuclear waste in their domestic waters if they could avoid it.

    • its_prolly_fine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have treated the waste water, so it isn’t dumping. The water is well below the recommended parameters for releasing water.

      There is nothing wrong with this. People are just freaking out because its “nuclear waste”, which causes people to be irrational.

      • Alto@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Decades and decades of fossil fuel company propaganda against nuclear is a helluva drug

          • lntl@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Solar?! Too expensive!! And it’s dark for half the day everyday! We need windd!!! Let’s continue to fight about stupid shit and ignore our emissions.

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk why the downvotes, I’m actually curious about this. Do you know how the waste is treated? I have a some education in radioactive materials and it doesn’t seem like an easy problem to solve.

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you have some “education about radioactive materials” you’d know that the half-life of tritium is 12.5years and that it is a beta emitter. This type of radiation isn’t harmful unless ingested. You would also know that the water has been diluted to safe levels before being released in the ocean, and even after that dilution, it will also not be released all at once, further reducing the chance of re-concentration and making radiation poisoning impossible. Finally since this is tritium we are talking about it, it isn’t a bio-accumlator and if you did drink too much tritated water, the treatment would be to drink an increased amount of tap water.

          Since you are still just “asking questions,” about how Tritrated water is “treated” it kind of sounds like you don’t actually know about radioactive materials at all otherwise you would know about H3, i.e. tritium and wouldn’t be concerned about “treatment” only the concentration of the released water.

            • Maalus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Cause you deserve it. You lie about your background and act as if you are “just asking questions” when in reality all you are doing to other people is saying “I’m an expert and treating this waste is impossible so how are they doing it”.

              • lntl@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                Still with the nasty…

                No one deserves to be spoken to that way. Do better.

                I’m educated enough to know it’s not necessarily a trivial process. The “treating waste is impossible” schtick are your words, not mine.

                Let me get it straight. You’re telling us that:

                • beta emitters aren’t so bad
                • the treatment process (which is what I asked about) is dilution

                Is that right? Dilution is the only “treatment” applied before discharge?

                • blterrible@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They settle out all of the heavier radioactive elements. They then dilute the remaining heavy water with additional water to drive the level of tritium to an acceptable level. It is then dumped into the ocean and rapidly mixes with the surrounding seawater. If you were to look at a map of ocean currents you’d see generally where it would go from there, but it doesn’t really matter because tritium isn’t really a significant concern. If they were dumping significant quantities of cobalt 60 you should care more, but they aren’t, so you shouldn’t.

    • blterrible@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The radioactive component is mostly tritium. As long as they get almost all of the heavy radioactive elements, the hydrogen isotopes are basically harmless in the quantities we’re talking about here. The ocean is a very, very big place.

      • AmberPrince@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I’m not sure where Amercia factors into a protest in South Korea, about Japan, as reported on by a journalism company based in the UK.

        • zephyreks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Generally, the people on these forums are American. It’s white people saying that the opinion of POC don’t matter because they’re not white.

      • zephyreks@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then y’all shouldn’t have a problem with it, right?

        Yet, every single response has been antagonistic because nobody wants this waste dumped near them.

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This water? I wouldn’t be concerned with at all. I’d gladly fill a swimming pool with it and shine some UV lights on it and throw a pool party. It would be approximately as dangerous as drinking from uranium glass. I wouldn’t recommend drinking large quantities of the water, much like I would recommend with all pool water, but otherwise it doesn’t matter.

            • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They filtered out the majority of the other bio-accumulating isotopes. “Trace amounts” of isotopes exist in every single element independent of nuclear power plants.

              • zephyreks@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                But the traces in the wastewater are fairly high, falling just below legal food limits (ignoring that bioaccumulation by definition accumulates toxins from the water into animals).

                • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Where are you reading that? I saw that the heavy metals were all filtered out and this discharge is for the Tritated Water only, with “trace” amounts of the heavy metals, meaning what you would find in normal salt water.

            • SphereofWreckening@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              How about linking to a source that doesn’t have a 30 to 15 dollar paywall for non-members? Or at the very least posting the full study instead of straight to the paywall that most people can’t afford.

              The paper is also from 2020 so it’s also missing the most recent information and context in regards to the water being diluted and sent out.

              Edit: a user directed me to where I could find the full study, and it can be found here Ultimately the study says there should be additional research into the isotopes found within the tanks beyond the tritium found in them.

              I definitely agree additional studying should be done, but even then the article doesn’t disagree with releasing the tanks. Instead they would rather wait until the isotopes are more decayed. There is however a risk of tank breach due to possible natural disasters such as tsunamis or earthquakes that would allow these isotopes to be release in a more potent concentration.

              So the option is to either release it in lower concentration and diluted water is specific amounts, or hold on to it and hope the tanks don’t breach for 60 years.

              • zephyreks@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The risk exposure isn’t changed, though. The plan is to slowly release it for decades… So if there’s natural disaster, the risk is still there.

                It’s Tepco wanting to preserve their bottom line at the cost of human health. Simple as that.

    • Bloops@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      1. It would be a waste of time and money
      2. You’d ask for an even bigger devil’s milkshake afterwards. There is no sating your superstitious trials
    • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would probably be better, actually. That would spread any bad stuff out more than just releasing it from a point source near the coast. But I think the emissions from the tankers would outweigh the lessened environmental impact.