There’s just something fucking hilarious about laying off employees, mocking them, and being sued for improperly firing them – and then whining that your competitor hired them and that they have access to Twitter information still.

I believe this fits well under the “fuck around and find out” doctrine.

  • fidodo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Non compete clauses are illegal in California.

    It’s dumb that they’re not illegal everywhere but Twitter and Facebook are both located there.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s fairly ridiculous. So long as they don’t take company property with them from the previous employer, there really shouldn’t be an issue. Patents should be more than sufficient to protect IP. If you’re concerned about someone building on that patent independently, you should probably do what it takes to keep them.

    • CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re rarely enforceable elsewhere, anyway. They usually depend on intimidating people, since they’re not likely to win in court for the vast majority of cases (which is why they should be straight up illegal).