produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agobugsdiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1297arrow-down17
arrow-up1290arrow-down1imagebugsdiscuss.tchncs.deprodunis@discuss.tchncs.de to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squareNailbar@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·edit-21 year agoIt looks like it’s decompiled from something, so all the variable names are missing and instead presented with whatever index they had in the binary. But that’s just a wild guess. I don’t know what actual decompiled code looks like.
minus-squareSurpriseWaterfall@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoI thought it was decompiled code at first to, but the function names are still real words. It’s almost like it was manually obfuscated by replacing all the variable names.
minus-squareNailbar@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoFound it. It’s just obfuscated to make it harder to copy. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11932567/found-this-nasty-code-i-wonder-what-it-does-should-i-be-worried#11932708
It looks like it’s decompiled from something, so all the variable names are missing and instead presented with whatever index they had in the binary.
But that’s just a wild guess. I don’t know what actual decompiled code looks like.
I thought it was decompiled code at first to, but the function names are still real words. It’s almost like it was manually obfuscated by replacing all the variable names.
Found it. It’s just obfuscated to make it harder to copy.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11932567/found-this-nasty-code-i-wonder-what-it-does-should-i-be-worried#11932708