On the side bar it lists the following:

  • [Matrix/Element]Dead
  • Discord

“Discord” is an active link, but the Matrix link is completely inactive. Not only is it inactive (which could have be excused as a broken link), but it is also manually labeled as “Dead”, as if there is no intention of making it work. How can a community that is focused on privacy willingly favor a service that is privacy non-respecting when a perfectly functional privacy-respecting alternative exists?

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    194
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the timeless debate between accessibility and exclusivity. Do you want more people in your community by compromising some values? Or would you rather be a hardliner but never reach those people?

    Most of the time you have to pick somewhere on that spectrum. It’s a question of pragmatism and utilitarianism.

    Does it do more good for lots of people to be slightly more privacy-aware, or is it better to have a very small portion of the population that are super privacy-aware?

    You have to decide, and the debate rages on all the time.

      • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait, really? So you think Matrix is the ultimate form of secure and private “chat” communities? Because if it is not then it is a compromise.

        This Lemmy instance for sure as hell is not the most private and secure.

          • NumbersCanBeFun@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I agree with you. I don’t understand why people are arguing that something less developed or stable is a valid reason to use something like discord, a widely anti privacy focused platform; to discuss privacy related topics.

            You can argue that it’s more stable but the cost is shepherding users into a platform they might think is secure by promoting it. In my opinion that’s worse because it lulls uneducated users into a false sense of security by having the community use and engage with each other there. The implication alone might cause some people not to second guess it since it’s supported by the community and that’s a problem for me personally.

          • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Never used it but I can imagine it being better. Discord is annoying as hell. Point was that the commenter seemed to argue that you should not accept any compromises, which seems silly to me.

          • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That depends on your threat model. All lemmy posts are publicly visible and can be scooped up by Farcebook, google et al. Discord is very definitely not properly private but all posts aren’t public. They are undoubtedly doing the same thing FB does and selling a semi anonymised set of meta data about you, but the world doesn’t have direct visibility

            I know the three letter acronyms have access to everything I do, hidden or not, I don’t like it but I don’t see anyway around it.

            I can however do my level best to keep FB, google, M$ out of my stuff to some extent

            • I dunno. The comment doesn’t have the word in it now; that’s why #1981 is important. But, maybe they didn’t and I imagined it.

              It remains true that not all compromises are equal, and the privacy compromises we make for Discord are relatively large compared to the ones for Matrix.

              • null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                There is an “edited” indicator for posts, and the post you’re referring to doesn’t have it.

                Sure, your point is true, but you were (incorrectly) accusing the other commenter of skipping a qualifier that would make your point relevant.

                • You’re right; Voyager doesn’t show the “edited” flag.

                  I was mistaken about the word, and the accusation about skipping over it was unwarrented.

                  I think this is missing the point by arguing semantics, but my phrasing was wrong.

      • RQG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not compromising at all would be not using the internet though. Probably live in a cottage somewhere in the middle of nowhere too.

      • RovingFox@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        The people that need a topic to be promoted are the people outside of the topic. A place where privacy and non privacy focused individuals can meet is needed to atract and teach new users.

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We all compromise somewhere, it’s just a question of where the line is. Even Richard Stallman makes concessions for things like Firmware and hardware being closed source.

    • Hazel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want a nicely bridget matrix - discord channel, so that the individuals of the community can choose themselves

      • TheHolyChecksum@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        How is this more accessible? Have you read the installation instructions? How would someone that has no IT background even manage to configure this? Even just grabbing a binary from the releases page is complicated for a lot of people.

    • Enigma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are you able to at least bridge you matrix to the discord? You should, at the very least, be able to do that while also promoting matrix.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      In addition to adoption, it takes time for the usability to catch up.

      Right now Signal is just as good (IMO better) as Messenger usability wise, but that wasn’t always there.

      Matrix needs some time to iron out those issues

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree to an extent, but usability is not a sufficient condition for mass adoption. I think Lemmy for end users is just as usable as Reddit was, at least for me it is. But people don’t want to leave their communities.

        That’s why personally I have a Discord still. There are too many communities I am an active part of on there to abandon Discord outright. Plus all of my friends and family are on there, and I’ve already approached some them about switching and they all have said the same thing I just did.

        I wasn’t ever super invested in Reddit, so it was easy for me to abandon it for Lemmy, and I vastly prefer the communities here. Discord though is a different story for now, unfortunately.

    • trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you want more people in your community by compromising some values? Or would you rather be a hardliner but never reach those people?

      Is there any reason you couldn’t have a discord and a matrix channel? It seems to me that would reach the most people.

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue becomes moderation at that point, not a big problem for a larger community, but small communities tend to struggle with moderation with just one hub of communications.

        Also, the hardliners wouldn’t be interested in co-existing, that’s against their ethics generally.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You also split your intended audience and every discussion. It’s one of the big issues with Lemmy and federation right now. People create multiple copies of the same community across different servers.