• atp2112@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    As far as I’m aware, neither of the striking unions have called for a consumer boycott.

    • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just kind of disgusting to be saying this shit jovially when people’s lives and families are at stake and actors are publicly threatening to burn down CEO’s homes.

      • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        He clarified his words after some people naturally started to take it a little too literally, but I don’t think he needed to.

        Whoever that “anonymous exec” was who said they wouldn’t even start to negotiate until strikers started losing their homes deserves to be pilloried.

      • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        He clarified his words after some people naturally started to take it a little too literally, but I don’t think he needed to.

        Whoever that “anonymous exec” was who said they wouldn’t even start to negotiate until strikers started losing their homes deserves to be pilloried.

        • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Pretty sure this walk back is simply because of the legal implications. It’s pretty obvious what he meant.

          Pillory is too nice for them.

          • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Idunno, the pillory could get pretty brutal if the crowd was sufficiently riled up. It wasn’t uncommon for people to bring stones or bricks.