• hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    My point was purely to say that in the future those running parts of the fediverse now need to be more cautious.

    And that’s where I disagree. This is like being attacked by a lion in Berlin. Yeah, it’s a risk, but tbh it’s just such a stupid situation that if it happens, we are decentralised so for most ppl it should be a minimal impact, and for the rest it’s unavoidable. My point is, there’s always a non-zero chance for this but we should waste no time thinking about this, as there’s no real solution to it. It’s like saying “there’s a non-zero chance my house can be hit by the shockwave a meteorite”. No one prepares for that, as it makes no sense to accomodate for that.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My comment is purely about new servers being set up. It’s decentralized but there is a massive margin of users on certain servers. It’s always a non-zero chance of something going wrong, but the fediverse shouldn’t be without responsibility and efforts to improve. If it’s know that certain TLDs are likely to take back a domain, then don’t use them.

      there’s a non-zero chance my house can be hit by the shockwave a meteorite

      More like “there’s a non-zero chance that country-based TLDs are more risky”

      One has real data behind it, one is a literal random basis