• Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    I seem to remember that Switzerland has a history of profiting from their relationships with Nazi’s. Thus they might not be a good source of advice as to what to do about Nazi’s.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The motherfucker lives in Switzerland and he supports Putin’s Sock Puppet. Fuck Andy. The USA will regress further away from the Swiss standard of living, which is what the USA should be striving for.

  • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I can’t be the only one who struggled to read that, and for general accessibility purposes since I’m already here:

    Image ID:

    andy1011000 Proton CEO posted:

    “People honestly seem to forget that I live in Switzerland, where Republican/Democrat doesn’t mean anything, and Trump isn’t even on our ballot to be voted for…”

    Onyx376. replied:

    “The point is that fighting for a more just and equal society is not just about fighting for the fundamental right to privacy but also for all other fundamental rights, including individual rights and life. When you, as the CEO of a company that starts from these principles, nod positively to whatever action a political figure like Trump, who is known for always flagrantly putting his private interests ahead of those of his own nation, makes speeches about eliminating minorities, hurting their rights as citizens and flirting with Nazi movements, it is understandable that members of the privacy community are disappointed as this reveals a little about who is being the face of a company that should follow contrary principles. But now we really know what “freedom” means to you.”

  • AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Ridiculous.

    He specifically started talking about American party politics, unprompted, making sweeping statements about both Democrats and Republicans. NOW he wants to blame us for…being concerned with his views on American party politics? Dude. Get real.

    Saying stupid shit now and then is forgivable, but not if you take it in as the new nucleus of your public image. Why do so many public figures have this compulsion to double down combatively?

  • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Now to reply to the post itself, I think this sums it up:

    As we say in Germany, if there's a Nazi at the table and 10 other people sitting there talking to him, you got a table with 11 Nazis.

    Though the sad truth is that almost every single product or service we use are owned and run by people with similar opinions, it is literally the nature of the capitalist beast, it’s how it function, and why it will always decay in to fascism - because those with the power and the money (not just those at the very very top, but several levels bellow them, too, like this guy) will always and forever care solely about maintaining it and creating more for themselves, that’s it. And to do that, they have to side with whichever dictator-du-jour benefits them the most.

    Remember - there is no ethical consumption under capitalism, and this is only one of the reasons why.

    • ZeroCool@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      He’s well on his way to reaching Muskian levels of failure to shut the hell up.

  • krnl386@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    The term “Nazi” has been overused so much, especially in US [identity] politics, that it’s losing (or has already lost) its meaning. When are we going to start calling elevator farts “genocide” and “nazism”? 🤷🏻‍♂️

    If the outrage is based on the screenshot of the comment above, I’d say that this is a typical example of “Swiss neutrality” with a touch of “I don’t give a flying f*ck about US politics because I don’t live in the US.” I don’t see how that makes you a nazi??

    I suspect I may be missing something here…

  • Onyx376@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1i2ff6q/call_for_andy_yen_to_resign/

    UPDATE: Andy Reply

    According to Andy’s logic, if Hitler were the president of some unfortunate country, we should differentiate the boss from his good nominees. Even using a company founded by an entire community to show a good evaluation made by one of its founders to give him a loving pat on the back and show the world that he is not completely bad as they think, but not meaning that the founder agrees with all his innocent actions, of course, such as disregarding the rights of many people around the world because they are just part of the democratic game.

    • sudneo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      So, to get this straight, for you it’s impossible to recognize that a pick for a position is a good pick in the Trump government, by definition, without consideration of the actual pick?

      To me this is religion, not politics or ideology (which I both consider very good things). To be even more clear, I consider Andy’s position completely rational and legitimate in this case. I believe it’s absolutely legitimate to be happy Trump picked someone good for a position and at the same time not support the rest 98%. At most, the interesting debate is why that pick is not good, which is 100% opinable and worthy of a discussion.

      But saying that any statement, in any context, whatever narrow and specific equal full support is completely insane to me.

    • _____@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      le false equivalence totally validates my endorsement for the worst president elected in US history

    • CaptSneeze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      “People forget I don’t live in China. Just because I praise Mao for wanting to shed the yoke of cultural tradition, doesn’t mean I necessary support everything he’s doing…” -Andy, if this was 1966

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Honestly I find his attitude to be quite commendable and I think that speaks much louder than whatever it is you disagree with.

      Maybe he should have just left Trump’s name out of it entirely as that seems to be what really pushed people’s buttons.

      People are going to twist things around no matter what is said though. Don’t forget hindsight makes everyone look guilty.

      • KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It would be one thing if Trump was actually anti-trust…but he isn’t.

        He’s anti companies which don’t prostrate themselves in front of him and bow to his whims. They’re bad, terrible, anti American companies. The ones that do are great, wonderful, beautiful companies. The bad ones need to be broken up and given to the big ones.

        He’s so transparent it’s painful. If someone says good things about Trump or give him money, they’re good. If they don’t, they’re bad. It’s absurdly obvious.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        He should have just stayed the fuck out of Americans politics being a provider of a secure service that many Americans of all political persuasions use.

        He is an idiot who cost his company business. The only spin is trying to downplay it at this point. The consequences are lost profits.

        • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Let’s be real. You mean he should have stayed out of it if he was going to voice an opinion that doesn’t match yours. People don’t want apolitical, they want an echo chamber.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            No, he should stay out of either side because business is about making money. I don’t want to know what politics you support. I don’t care for politicizing everything. It is a fucking turn off.

            You want my money, do your job, sell me your product, give me your service, but don’t talk to me about your hot takes on politics. Also religion as well. I and many many other people don’t want to hear it.

            • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Your comment might hold a valid argument, if your previous comments hadn’t made it perfectly clear you take issue with the fact he praised something a politician you don’t like has done.

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Whether you agree with my character or not what I said was accurate for any business person/enterprise. It is really not beneficial and increases risk unnecessarily.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Maybe he should have just left Trump’s name out of it entirely as that seems to be what really pushed people’s buttons.

        It probably didn’t help, but no, I don’t think that was it. I think it was his sweeping generalizations about dems/republicans as a whole, along with the insinuation that dems were bought, republicans are “looking out for the little guys”, and the election undermined the will of the people:

        Dems had a choice between the progressive wing (Bernie Sanders, etc), versus corporate Dems, but in the end money won and constituents lost. Until corporate Dems are thrown out, the reality is that Republicans remain more likely to tackle Big Tech abuses.

        • sudneo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          You are right about the generalization on parties, but the “little guy” he meant are small tech companies opposed to big tech. It was clear to me in the context, and to clear any doubt, he explicitly said that in a reddit comment.

          I want to specify because this has been stretched on here as far as “he said republicans care for the working class”.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    All he had to do was keep his mouth shut & show his support on another account

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    He’s kind of right on the money and kind of being completely dumb.

    The fact of it is that Republicans don’t want to help privacy or take down big tech’s abuses, they want to make it worse. All of the reasonable things Andy has said have taken place past that, so in a way the entire conversation is talking past the point.

    The question is, how can somebody so influential at a major privacy company not have such a pre-school understanding of major world figures’ relationships to his core business?

  • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Andy will one day find out that, in the eye of the magat beholder, he is nothing but yellow. I hope he enjoys getting spent as the token he has become.

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Lmao that onyx guys comment is at -18

      And protons reply:

      I believe this is a false equivalence. Supporting a nominee for antitrust, is not the same as endorsing everything else Trump may or may not believe in or flirting with Nazism as you put it. It goes too far to draw that conclusion about Proton or myself.

      They just dont get it

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        What the echo chamber of reddit doesnt have critical thinking? Well I never…

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Looks like Lemmy is just as bad. I wish the mods would get in here and temp ban some folks who dont understand lemmyquite

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Lemmy.world is the worst offender I have come across personally. Lemmy.ml is reddit like too, but it’s mostly okay for discussion and it hosts a lot of posts so I don’t really want to block it.