Some one should sue them for the maximum highest costs calculable for the travel time of having to return their products buying a new substitute brand, and going back home + legal fees.
Then that person should buy the product again to see if there’s still an agreement in place, and sue them again.
The media will once again over play the hand of leftwing politics.
Just like how they recently helped Trump woth his health problems by pointing out his swollen ankles.
They just never know when to just let a win ride.
Metals are crystals ao why wouldn’t they grow hairs? Probably just stray electrons and alignment issues lining up. Crystals do things, what’s the big deal?
Unless you have had three independent data recovery companies confirm the data can’t be recovered - I’m not buying it.
For the software erase it says:
Even if power is interrupted during the data wiping process, the drive will automatically resume clearing data the next time it gets power, says Team Group.
We aren’t sure of the wiping algorithm or tech, so we would assume there remains a chance of data recovery after this software-powered wipe, or partial wipe.
For the hardware erase, it says recovery might be more effort than it’s worth. So sounds like neither mode gets proven results.
It’s essentially a dangerous scam.
More lanes = more cars which generally means worse (slower) traffic.
Plenty of YouTubes videos for them to learn about that.
Wouldn’t want to upset the people who have the actual Epstein list/tapes.
Are they ruins or a monument? Were the parts with cross beams gonna be doorways or windows? A giant round house perhaps?
I think this has happened in a few radio competitions…
Put your hand on the car the longest and you win the car, that sort of thing. I think if you’re really holding on it’s your bladder that splits first.
Game recognizes game.
New meaning to the term “insider”.
Screwworms are currently in negotiations with the Trump administration.
You’ll often find discussions in the comments section (also your first comment to me asked me to explain my views).
You seem deaf to what I’m saying. There are cultural tensions involved. Yes people choose their ethical compliances but those choices are always constrained by cultural, educational, and structural bounds. The cultural messaging of the time.
Before this generation were the first school shooters, before them it was satanic panic related crimes, before them it was the first post WW2 street gangs.
These are all topics that insert violence into cultural frameworks without having the necessary discussions of causes and the messaging around these frameworks.
I’d call your user name “weird”, but I’m not one to use social pressures like that, and would rather have conversations where the actual issues and causes are discussed.
I’m trying to normalize that singles aren’t having sex…
… because the feeling that young men not having sex is abnormal causes a bad mindset.
Yeah they think it’s extraordinary to not be having sex when single, so it’s women’s fault.
When being sexless is the majority of what being single means.
So the anti-terrorism laws have been used before and apply to all terrorism…
My comment is mocking that incel - which basically means single and upset about it, is being made central to the headline.
Just say he’s a misogynist. Pretending it’s something abnormal for single men to not be having sex just extends the premise of “incels” (the idea that they should be upset about it, or that it’s extra).
PNAT laws increase the severity of all terrorism related prosecutions. They aren’t aimed at “incels” in particular.
Hitler, great replacement, and communicating with women, aren’t incel traits. That last one in particular.
That’s far-right stuff.
Plenty of leftwing incels.
Springtime for Hitler