I guess the tauon decays of its own volition then.

Here in the EU

I wish people would stop painting their experience as the default for 500M people in 30-ish countries across an entire continent.

What the fuck is your logic? “I get a right to air, so I will pollute it for you.”

Removed by mod

Any place where you don’t force your smoke upon people who have no choice about being there. It’s not that hard: Don’t make your smoking anybody else’s problem.

Or, if this is more your style of communicating: Up your ass.

That Head First about design patterns actually takes heavy inspiration from the Gang of Four. I haven’t read both (only Head First), but I’d wager you don’t need to read GoF if you’ve read Head First.

Only the writing style… is somewhat cringy.

Why do smokers of all kinds have to smoke right in front of the door of every fucking building?

Is that one of those instances where the doctors of old tried to look at animals and project that knowledge onto humans?

No offence, but this is useless advice and exactly the reason why I wanted official data. “Usually”s and “Shoulds” don’t help. Especially for a completely different graphics card.

I would’ve liked some sort of official source, since other sites may have errors. (Of course the Nvidia page could contain errors, too, but I assumed they’d be more scrutinized than page number 328 which scrapes these details.)

When people get promoted to senior dev, they have lost all will to live. Their code reflects that.

It works well enough to keep the boss man off my back. I’ll go home now.

Same question: If a species evolves to adapt to a changed environment, is the original species extinct?

Yes, yes it is. That’s why a species ‘going extinct’ doesn’t always mean that it suddenly died off.

The single most bestest book that I wish my very first programming teacher would’ve hit me over the head with is “Code Complete 2” by Steve McConnell. I’ve only encountered it a few years into my studies, and time and again I thought: I had to figure this out myself!

It’s basically a collection of all the things you can consider, or think about, or do or do differently when programming. Nothing in there is revolutionary, and none of it is something you couldn’t come up with yourself, but I found it immensely helpful to have the content laid out in a structured way.

The Wifi thing is true enough.

Pinning your opinion to the top is an abuse of power.

A commit all by itself doesn’t mean as much without context.

Luckily a commit points to its parent, which means the context is inherently present. What’s your point?

Why would I not want to be able to apply a commit to any arbitrary branch?

Nobody said that.

Any shortcomings it may have aren’t necessarily due to a flaw in git.

True enough.

If I hand you a commit, you cannot tell which ‘branch’ it is on without searching the git history and hoping that you only get one answer. That’s a bummer if, for instance, you’re a github action and only get handed the commit. If it’s on the master branch, I want to do different things than if it’s a dev branch.

Only git wasn’t done in 10 days. It was very quickly able to track its own development, but it still took Linus half a year of thinking to be able to make git.

(No, sorry, I can’t find the interview that would validate that claim.)

So, are there no households in those northern provinces or do they just not eat? I thought Greenland was the king of No data available.

Sex sex sex sex sex sex