why is there 0 response on the honey and billet labs thing, which is part of that same wan show? what’s with this half done response, why not show all the receipts? and also, why does he bring up a threat of legal action when there was no actual threat of legal action if you see that wan show?

this is such a disappointment, I’m apparently meant to watch as these two adults constantly miscommunicate, misunderstand and ignore half of what the other has said online, and stretch the back and forth even longer than it needs to. This will take like 5 wan shows and gn articles to conclude properly

deleted by creator

Think about the wording of the headings so that they communicate as much as possible without sacrificing brevity.

Which of these tutorials would you rather read?

1. Go
2. Installation
3. Hello, world!
4. Deployment

Or this?

1. Why Choose Go?
2. Install Go 1.23
3. Create a Basic “Hello, World” Go App
4. Deploy Your App to the Web

honestly, neither of those? I get the general point, the first one looks careless and vague, but the second one looks AI generated and needlessly long, hard to skim for what I’m looking for. Why do the headers say Go 3 times when I already know I am in a Go article? Why is the specific version in that one header (even if you will be pointing them to a specific one in the content)?

explaining over engineering with an over engineered answer, nice