Right after Andrew Tate.

Convicted liar Michael Flynn, who the judge asked why he wasn’t on trial for treason? That one?

Well, it’s good that they ruled out possession of chemically impossible related substances.

And let’s be clear: Until 2013, the majority of Newsweek readership consisted of people waiting in dentist’s offices. It was a reliable source in the same sense as Reader’s Digest.

They are the same…

Not at all. But that doesn’t mean that the resistance is going to coalesce around the Democrats.

Some advice for demonstrations (including propaganda of the deed):

• Wear a ski mask. Wear rubber gloves.
• Wear anonymous clothing.
• Don’t trust phones. Don’t use them to plan, and leave them turned on at home.
• Use a cell structure to organize, and share info on a need-to-know basis only.
• Assume there are not only cameras but microphones.
• Don’t drive anywhere near the location of the demo. Ride-haining services are even worse. Don’t even cycle in unless you can go off-road.
• Distinguish individuals’ property from corporate property.
• The goal is to live to fight another day. A fair fight is one in which you don’t get hurt.

This is further evidence that Agent Orange’s mission is to sow chaos and discord, and to sabotage the government and economy.

Power that is not used is not power.

Next they’ll be going after the judge’s family members.

Better he should sell one of his kidneys.

Words mean nothing to Trump, except as a means of getting his way.

Tesla is not owned by the government, the cars being burnt are not leased to the Feds, and it’s unclear if Tesla is receiving Federal financial assistance in the sense meant in this law. So the law doesn’t appear to fit the facts of the case. Looks like a malicious prosecution.

Because someone’s resisting Musk, that’s why.

Being level-headed would involve investigating before making accusations.

Concentration camps.

Real capitalism, over all time and everywhere, has almost never been free-market.

“We’d commit genocide but we’re too squeamish” is also an indefensible position.

Ukraine and Russia have been brothers in arms for a thousand years

Stalin committed genocide against Ukraine less than 100 years ago.

You’re assuming individual citizens are going to directly face the military. It’ll be a guerilla war fought by irregulars. Militaries are piss-poor at putting those down, especially against their own citizens. You hit them where they aren’t, not where they expect you.

And yet poorly armed civilians have overthrown governments. Why is that? Could it be that relative firepower is not the only factor?

Also, even if it’s a matter of force meeting force, focused application of force at a critical point is determinative, not overall force. History is full of cases where smaller forces won.