stephen01king

The article tried to paint this as an effect of Oct 7th, instead of the effect from Israel performing a genocide, which they never mentioned once. It’s clearly a very biased article.

Are you talking about [email protected] or [email protected]?

What is your point, actually?

It was prompted by the mention of another crash that was centred around whether FSD was the cause or not. It was a discussion on the fact that Tesla will always claim that their self driving technology is never the one at fault, even in cases where it was clear that it was. Nobody here said all Tesla crashes are caused by the FSD.

That comment tries to misrepresent the argument by applying the accusation to every crash involved with the brand, but the comment you quoted correctly brought back the proper context by only applying it to crashes caused by a feature called Full Self Driving. Just because someone tried to sneakily change the context of the conversation, doesn’t make every comment in reply to it must follow that change.

You do realise he talked specifically about crashes that are caused by a feature advertised as self-driving and not every crash ever by a car brand, don’t you?

Nobody said it was.

Give specific examples.

Exactly, the future is a bunch of smaller task specific models that can be called rather than one massive general use model. It should save a lot of power in terms of inference as well.

I like the episode of The Dresden Files with Claudia Black in it. It’s just that one episode, though.

Can they even learn from their own experience?

I think you’re lucky if you’ve never had an interest you weren’t smart enough to enjoy properly.

It’s usually the first migration that people are most resistant to. The 2nd or 3rd time is a lot easier.

Which standard were you referring to when you made your conclusion?

That’s not how tables work unless they specify it is a totals column.

You said it, not me.

So claims come from your imagination?

How frequently are we talking about here?

I can still see your comment. And if he did ban you, you can link to the modlogs, though I’m not sure exactly how to find it.

Edit: Saw the modlogs, so he did ban you, but of course no mention of which comment caused that. My assumption is he could simply be Blue MAGA, but not necessarily Zionist.

Gonna need a link to which comment caused the ban for me to make a proper judgement.