lad

One can be pro- or anti- any concept or thing, some options just make more sense

Oh, but that’s but a ten year long accident, nothing deliberate /s

This may have been sole reason to do that, so of course he did

They started replacing the default screenshot tool with snipping tool, but maybe it’s not the default to call it with PrtScr

Saving from source was in context of saving from Instagram, I find screenshooting Web pages less fitting than getting into the source of the page, albeit the former is simpler

Doesn’t that call the same snipping tool? Anyway, saving from source may preserve quality a bit better

I don’t think this operator is a real feature, tbh 😅

… what?

I don’t get it, does it imply that there’s no way to tell a difference, or is there some other meaning?

This is an interesting article, but I think that this standardisation is exactly for port being the same, not for pinning specific implementation of the 600+ pages long standard.

Wow what a marketing scum trick to show all compatible older generations as separate products

Maybe a rat brain project? I think the mapping of human may take longer, but yeah, once it happens interesting times are on the horizon

I feel like you’re considering death penalty to be the default, but if the same logic is applied while considering lifetime in prison as the default, the result would be the opposite.

And considering that death of age looks to me more natural, I’m inclined to think no death penalty should be the default

Also, maybe in a world where you measure anyone with money it makes sense to measure intelligence with money ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

A dog may be able to fully react and learn how to react with the exterior. But can it modify itself the way human brain can?

As per current psychology’s view, yes, even if to a smaller extent. There are problems with how we define conscience, and right now with LLMs most of the arguments are usually related to the Chinese room and philosophical zombie thought experiments, imo

I’d say that difference between nature boiling down to maths and LLMs boiling down to maths is that in LLMs it’s not the knowledge itself that is abstracted, it’s language. This makes it both more believable to us humans, because we’re wired to use language, and less suitable to actually achieve something, because it’s just language all the way down.

Would be nice if it gets us something in the long run, but I wouldn’t keep my hopes up

Nah, it’s just a legacy of British colonialism, it’s forbidden by the state to harm yourself in UK (half joking, because it really is a crime to harm yourself consensually)

because I’m not interested in arguing

This sounds more toxic to me, tbf

Judicial system working like this (including the previous comments about pleas) is something I would’ve probably doubted if I read it in a fiction, but here we are

I think it’s along the lines of ‘if the prosecution presented an accusation that is obviously false, how well standing is the rest of the case’

If I were in the jury, a case that is part bullshit would definitely compel me to think again about how well the investigation was done

Not quite related to the topic, but I encountered several ‘books’ that can be replaced by several paragraphs of text, and this is almost as bad as making three hours video instruction where 30 seconds or a bit of text would suffice. I find it horrible that such ones are written at all