Showerhead seems like an issue. I guess if you can articulate it to point to the wall and the wall is well sealed it’s probably ok.

CEOs hate this one trick

Thanks. Fixed.

Oh, 100%. He’s a person living in a house. He doesn’t need to add his extra room to the housing market. If he does, that’s just extra supply and that’s good.

I have a large basement. I don’t think it’s immoral to not rent it out.

You own a house. You live in it. This is fine.

You have an extra room that you add to the housing market. That’s a net positive. It drives down costs.

The other option is that you live in that house alone and don’t have that room available. That reduces supply and that’s bad.

Here’s the issue. He’s getting this house for free. It’s going to cost him money to sell it.

He’s living in it. He doesn’t need to add his extra room to the housing market. He could just live in that house alone. His choosing to put his room onto the market drives down costs. That’s a net positive.

Legal isn’t moral. Economics don’t make right.

Consuming more than you require intentionally could be seen as unethical. You can see this all over society.

No raindrop thinks itself responsible for the flood.

Poor communities already do this to support each other. They watch each other’s kids. They run errands for each other. They don’t keep track and charge cash and create an LLC. But community support is real.

So you’re supporting his claim.

I thought you’d be excited to have a solution…

Good point. So it’s more akin to saying “black men’s lives matter” then. Both are oppressed groups, one more than the other, but why dice it up like that?

I think the answer in this case is that the solutions are different. One is about improving disability and healthcare, one is about minimum wage. But they didn’t make it nearly clear enough that they would improve disability. They only focus on the minimum wage message.

If they allow one, they have to allow everyone

Oh! You haven’t heard! We can tailor laws to do whatever we as society desire. So we could interpret this law to mean that signs drawn by children without any company logos count as art, and anything done by a paid artist or with logos is not.

Isn’t that neat? :-D

I’m convinced the reason we have so much government is to control that portion. And it’s not even doing that good of a job.

This is a “black lives matter” messaging situation. Just because working people deserve a living wage doesn’t mean other people don’t.

It’s annoying that this isn’t obvious. But I agree that it’s not.

Third parties don’t and can’t work. The system is rigged for that. Better to start an anti-ceo PAC.

For a large portion of time in those small anarchist communities, they’d raid and kill each other.

How would we prevent that?

The math:

https://gerrymander.princeton.edu/redistricting-report-card

This isn’t too say there are zero instances, obviously. But Democrats are gerrymandering in the same way that my 8 year old is a sculptor.

Where’s the con part? Did he guarantee they’d go up or something?

Exactly. I never would’ve heard of this country if not for the stupid promotion. Now I’m going to spend their $5