Nope, not me… I’m still trying.

  • nef@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    By that definition no human has ever had an “original” thought.

    • ehpolitical@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Not true… every thought had to have been thought for a first time by someone, just not by us (it seems).

      • nef@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        it includes absolutely nothing that’s already familiar to you

        I truly do not believe that any thought exists without context, if you can find any examples I would be happy to be proven wrong.

          • nef@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sure, but by your definition any thought containing any kind of language would not be “original” because it requires familiarity with the language.