The current hostile corporate takeover in the USA and the clear loss of political power of the common people, I started wondering what happened if people used consumption as their leverage. Since the system is designed for continuous growth, what would happen if a mass movement of people stopping buying new non-essential consumer goods?

It would send a much stronger message than angry public protests. Thoughts?

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    They’ll just buy the things they didn’t buy before hand, or afterwards, washing it all out in the average.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      After a long enough period of striking it begins to have repercussions beyond the individual budget.

      If the flow of money slowed to a crawl for an extended period, companies don’t have the funds to pay workers. Enough job loss leads to further reduced spending, thus impacting stock value, thus impacting employment, etc…

      A month would have a noticeable impact, but a full fiscal quarter would be the first cliff where the big corporations would really sweat. But generally I agree, an economic strike with an end date is like an overnight hunger strike