A survey of more than 2,000 smartphone users by second-hand smartphone marketplace SellCell found that 73% of iPhone users and a whopping 87% of Samsung Galaxy users felt that AI adds little to no value to their smartphone experience.

SellCell only surveyed users with an AI-enabled phone – thats an iPhone 15 Pro or newer or a Galaxy S22 or newer. The survey doesn’t give an exact sample size, but more than 1,000 iPhone users and more than 1,000 Galaxy users were involved.

Further findings show that most users of either platform would not pay for an AI subscription: 86.5% of iPhone users and 94.5% of Galaxy users would refuse to pay for continued access to AI features.

From the data listed so far, it seems that people just aren’t using AI. In the case of both iPhone and Galaxy users about two-fifths of those surveyed have tried AI features – 41.6% for iPhone and 46.9% for Galaxy.

So, that’s a majority of users not even bothering with AI in the first place and a general disinterest in AI features from the user base overall, despite both Apple and Samsung making such a big deal out of AI.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    Id take Bixby back over this forced AI crap.

    I mean I wouldn’t but you know…

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    As an android user (Pixel), I’ve only ever opened AI by accident. My work PC is a mac and it force-reenables apple intelligence after every update. I dutifully go into settings and disable that shit. While summarizing things is something AI can be good at, I generally want to actually read the detail of work communications since, as a software engineer, detail is a teeeny bit important.

  • DaChrissy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 minutes ago

    I like the idea of generating emojis with Ai on phones. All other use cases that apple has presented seem useless to me. I was really hoping it would be something, anything, but it was just underwhelming. And then apple didnt even have it ready for the iphone 16 at launch but said the phone was built for apple intelligence…? Seems kinda rushed and half baked to me. I also like using copilot is vscode. Its proven to be pretty good at helping me debug

  • TylerBourbon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    I do not need it, and I hate how it’s constantly forced upon me.

    Current AI feels like the Metaverse. There’s no demand for it or need for it, yet they’re trying their damndest to shove it into anything and everything like it’s a new miracle answer to every problem that doesn’t exist yet.

    And all I see it doing is making things worse. People use it to write essays in school; that just makes them dumber because they don’t have to show they understand the topic they’re writing. And considering AI doesn’t exactly have a flawless record when it comes to accuracy, relying on it for anything is just not a good idea currently.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    It actually gets in my way every time it does something so that I have stop what I’m doing to kill it. Would love to be able to uninstall it

  • Ilixtze@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Ai is a waste of time for me; I don’t want it on my phone , I don’t want it on my computer and I block it every time I have the chance. But I might be old fashioned in that I don’t like algorithms recommending anything to me either. I never cared what the all seeing machine has to say.

  • iamjackflack@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    Ai sucks and is a waste of humanity’s resources. I hate how everything goes on buzzwords industry trends. This shit needs to stop and just focus on simplicity and reliability. We need to stop trying to sell new things every cycle

    • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      I don’t think it’s meant to be useful…for us, that is. Just another tool to control and brainwash people. I already see a segment of the population trust corporate AI as an authority figure they trust.

      How could it not be this way? Algorithms trained people to never seek out information on their own. They’re trained to be fed info from the rich and never seek anything out on their own.

      Like, we say dead internet. Except…nothing is actually stopping us from ditching corporate internet websites and just go back to smaller privately owned or donation run forums.

      Check out debate boards. Full of morons using ChatGPT to speak for them and they’ll both openly admit it and get mad at you for calling it dehumanizing and disrespectful.

      /tinfoil hat

      Edit to add more old man yells at clouds detail.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        50 minutes ago

        nothing is actually stopping us from ditching corporate internet websites and just go back to smaller privately owned or donation run forums.

        I didn’t even realize until you said this that I already do that lol

  • Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    I don’t see how AI can benefit my phone experience.

    I use my phone to make phone calls and for text messaging. Where does AI fit in? It doesn’t.

  • Jimius@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Just look at Smart Speakers. Basically the early AI at home. People just used them to set timers and ask about the weather. Even though it was capable of much more. Google and others were unable to monetize them for this reason and have mostly given up. (Protip: if you have a google speaker and kids, ask about the animal of the day. It’s an addition during COVID times for kids learning at home.)

    But people also aren’t used to AI yet. Most will still google for something, some already skip that step and have ChatGPT search and summarize. I would not be surprised if the internet of the future is just plain text files for the AI agents to scrape.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m shocked, I tell you. Absolutely shocked. And if you believe that, I got some oceanfront property in Arizona. I’ll sell you too.

  • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Not sure if Google Lens counts as AI, but Circle to Search is a cool feature. And on Samsung specifically there is Smart Select that I occasionally use for text extraction, but I suppose it is just OCR.

    From Galaxy AI branded features I have tested only Drawing assist which is an image generator. Fooled around for 5 minutes and have not touched it again. I am using Samsung keyboard and I know it has some kind of text generator thing, but have not even bothered myself to try it.

    • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Certainly counts, Samsung has a few features like grabbing text from images that I found useful.

      My problem with them is its all online stuff and I’d like that sort of thing to be processed on device but thats just me.

      I think folks often are thinking AI is only the crappy image generation or chat bots they get shoved to. AI is used in a lot of different things, only difference is that those implementations like drawing assist or that text grabbing feature are actually useful and are well done.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The AI thing I’d really like is an on-device classifier that decides with reasonably high reliability whether I would want my phone to interrupt me with a given notification or not. I already don’t allow useless notifications, but a message from a friend might be a question about something urgent, or a cat picture.

    What I don’t want is:

    • Ways to make fake photographs
    • Summaries of messages I could just skim the old fashioned way
    • Easier access to LLM chatbots

    It seems like those are the main AI features bundled on phones now, and I have no use for any of them.

    • drthunder@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      That’s useful AI that doesn’t take billions of dollars to train, though. (it’s also a great idea and I’d be down for it)

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You mean paying money to people to actually program. In fair exchange for their labor and expertise, instead of stealing it from the internet? What are you, a socialist?

        /s