ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 2 days agoCathy, do the math.slrpnk.netimagemessage-square278fedilinkarrow-up11.88Karrow-down110
arrow-up11.87Karrow-down1imageCathy, do the math.slrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square278fedilink
minus-squareSheldan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 hours agoI don’t read it like that. The sentence just says that their pay rate has that amount, not that it is connected to them not being a union member.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-211 hours agoWho’s “we” then, if not non-union members?
minus-squareSheldan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-26 hours agoThe people the contract is with, maybe all employees of the company have the agreement. You are thinking way too much into that statement, the way I described is the way it works here, and that seems much more likely tbh.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours ago The people the contract is with, maybe all employees of the company have the agreement. That’s literally what I’m saying.
I don’t read it like that. The sentence just says that their pay rate has that amount, not that it is connected to them not being a union member.
Who’s “we” then, if not non-union members?
The people the contract is with, maybe all employees of the company have the agreement.
You are thinking way too much into that statement, the way I described is the way it works here, and that seems much more likely tbh.
That’s literally what I’m saying.