I saw that this instance had a large number of users so I thought “more users->more content->more fun”. Apparently, I had to prove my value by answering 3 questions that showed my interest in their community and my value as a potential future member.

What could possibly be my value to a general purpose instance besides money? I’m a software/cloud engineer so I guess there are things I could help with, but my guess is they were expecting me to say “I can donate”.

I get it, they need donations to exist, but this upfront? And to a community I don’t even know? Maybe I’m imagining things and they were looking for something else?

Do all instances rely on donations? I’d like to contribute to the instances I enjoy at some point. But only if I feel at home with them, not as a prerequisite to join.

  • SharkEatingBreakfast@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    I got in with 3 or 4 sentences about a month ago.

    We can’t really guess as to why your admission was denied unless you post what you had written.

    I’m not sure why you’d jump directly to the conclusion that your denial was based on money?

      • Zetaphor@zemmy.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        The questions are intended to get you to stop, read the rules, consider if you want to be there, and to be earnest about it. Nobody said it was a mechanism to prevent bots. Just because it’s not 100% secure against fraud and botting doesn’t mean it’s useless either.

        I thought the only logical conclusion for gatekeeping with those questions was the donations.

        I fail to see the logic in that connection. The first fact does not in any way directly lead to the other. They want to curate a specific type of community and they have a very limited set of tools at their disposal. The fact that those tools are not foolproof doesn’t mean they’re part of some rouse to ask you for money.

        It’s just so illogical to think those questions are any kind of real ethical filter.

        You’re clearly missing the point of what Beehaw is going for, which may have been a contributing factor to your rejected application. You could always try again with a different identity, or since it seems you may not be what they’re looking for you could just move on and enjoy your time in the fediverse from your sh.itjust.works account.

        • SharkEatingBreakfast@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re clearly missing the point of what Beehaw is going for, which may have been a contributing factor to your rejected application.

          I know it’s harsh and kinda’ mean, but:

          Hey, look! The questions are doing their intended job!

      • SharkEatingBreakfast@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I did not just say “nice things” in my application. I talked about my what goals were in joining such a community, mentioned how my values seemed to line up with what they seemed to be fostering, and talked about what I might be able to contribute to such a space.

        Answering a questionnaire like that won’t keep out every bot or bad actor, but it certainly stops a large majority of fuckery from waltzing in willy-nilly.

        It does have another reason: the current load on Beehaw from the influx of new users is absolutely wrecking things on its infrastructure. It was not designed to withstand the amount of users that have migrated over.

        It’s honestly not that deep. Not to be rude, but you seem to be taking it very personal. I promise that it’s not!