Example: I believe that IP is a direct contradiction of nature, sacrificing the advancement of humanity and the world for selfish gain, and therefore is sinful.

Edit: pls do not downvote the comments this is a constructive discussion

Edit2: IP= intellectal property

Edit3: sort by controversal

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree with your attitude about IP. For tens of thousands of years humans freely imitated every good idea they saw, in a process known as “the spread of civilization”. But then somebody figured out how to make shitloads of money by producing copies of other people’s work and paying them a pittance, aka “royalty”, and suddenly copying and imitation became immoral.

    • cotardious@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe look at the time since when inventions grew exponentially and you’ll see that it correlates with IP protection.

      Every protected IP right may be an incentive for someone to circumvent it thereby generating new ideas/inventions.

      There is no black and white. Some exploit the IP rights but this should be a reason for politics to amend the law so that the exploit is no longer possible. Hate the player, not the game.

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Invention and cultural development had been growing exponentially for centuries before IP laws - it was called The Renaissance. The creation of IP laws to enrich publishers didn’t start that. Pretending it did is a common false talking point.