• wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    We really need to get rid of SIN numbers.

    They should be cryptographically signed tokens you request for a single individual service, with a defined scope of access.

    E.g. when you want to set up payroll tax at a new job, you go online or visit service canada, register a token, and share that with your employer.

    When you’re authorizing H&R Block to do you taxes, you request a tax token for the current year.

    When you’re opening a bank account you request a token and the bank verifies it.

    When these leak they are easily reset, and when credit bureaus need access to your history for a hard check, they request a token with that permission.

    This is kind of a pain but it means the office administrator can’t open a credit card in your name just because they have your info, and a leak at H&R Block gives a specific scope of investigation and resolution.

    Your account can still be breached, buy that has a clear resolution step (verify your identity with service Ontario or Canada Post, invalidate tokens, file an investigation, and submit new tokens).

    • Snowstorm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      This guy gets it. 100% agree.

      Then second step : shared responsibility for theft like if someone buy a car in your name you aren’t stuck with 100% of the problem because the dealership is 50% liable. Third step : Insurances need to be available for the residual risk but with 50-50 liability everyone will be on their best behaviour.

    • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I agree but we don’t even have to get that far. No institution should rely on SIN secrecy. It’s as simple as that. It should be treated as semi-publicly available information like birthdates and important stuff like opening a bank account should require more factors of authentication.

      Several countries don’t create these secret numbers that “no one should have but you” without having to rely on revoke-able tokens and whatnot. Like many things, crypto has a clever solution for this but the current status quo is so bad that a not-stupid approach would already be quite the improvement.

  • Otter@lemmy.caM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    People affected:

    If you worked at B.C.'s Interior Health authority between 2003 and 2009 and believe you may be the victim of stolen identity or a hacked CRA account, please email, in confidence, [email protected] or text or call 416-526-4704. Click here to contact CBC News completely anonymously using SecureDrop.

  • asg101@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    And as a condition to use their site the CRA makes you agree that you can’t hold them responsible for any misuse of your data they may allow. How conveeeeeenient.

  • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Great. Good thing (?) I didn’t unlock my account after the last breach because I never have 3 hours to do nothing while I wait on hold with CRA support.