Can someone remind me why we stopped using Firefox a while back? There was some piece of news that broke everyone’s trust, but I can’t remember what Mozilla did. Was it a change in their user agreement?

  • Go-On-A-Steam-Train@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have a silly reason! I got a windows phone and loved it, so was happy to use Edge (when it was still its own thing and not effectively Chrome).

    Edge’s PDF viewer was great, and in general things were speedy, got out the way, and best of all it synced bookmarks to my phone. :) I also liked the rewards system for using bing, and between microsoft and google, I regarded google as worse ethically. (Obviously… yeah not a solid argument)

    I think I switched back to firefox and variants mainly because I started caring about my data, open-source, and also those advantages Edge had were eroding in real-time, with adverts, nagging, and Windows things creeping in - the rewards ended, the chrome thing, it started feeling like the IE days again.

    One of my coworkers uses it still, and it pains me to see what new AI gimmick is being shoehorned in.

    If I stopped for dumb reasons, I like to think I came back wiser for it. :)

      • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It was. It was crazy fast and lightweight at the time.

        It gained massive market share.

        It became the default development target for websites.

        Other browsers started getting left behind.

        Each step syphons users from other browsers, compounding issues.

        • sbv@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The dev tools in Chrome were a revelation. I think Firefox had something similar (Firebug?) but the Chrome tools seemed better.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        When Chrome initially came out? Not even close. Firefox was a bloated piece of crap, Chrome was slim and didn’t have all the bullshit that every other browser had.

        Obviously, things have changed a little…

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think OP is mostly focusing on why people switched off of FF. Present behaviour isn’t super relevant to the conversation.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I never fully did, but I did end up using Chromium more than I wanted to:

    1. Some poorly written sites refuse to work with FF. My water company, for example. They eventually fixed it after I complained multiple times. Now they display a warning that it’s “Optimized for Chrome” but no longer flat out prevent FF from logging in (you know, to pay bills and such).
    2. FF Desktop still doesn’t support PWAs, and their recent update says they’re working on it, but they’re half-assing it (installed web apps will still have the menu bars, address, bar etc). I self-host a lot of web applications and want them to appear like native apps. Hence, Chromium.
    3. There was some recent ToS / Privacy Policy change, and everyone was knee-jerking “time to abandon Firefox” as if there’s anywhere else to go.
    4. A good while back, Chrom(ium) was just flat-out faster. That’s been a while, and I think when FF’s “Quantum” update (or whatever it was called) came out in like 2016 or 2017, it put it back on par.
  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Probably

    I didn’t though, because the alternative would either be very small browsers with no or very limited addon support, or FF forks. And until now, everything Mozilla added was either opt-in or very easy opt-out. So hopping wouldn’t change much for me, except that there’s no LibreWolf nightly, and I doubt that self-compiled addons work there consistently.

    • miguel@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That was the final straw for me, I switched over to waterfox for nominally more privacy.

  • bluegreenwookie@bookwormstory.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I stopped using it and went to chrome bc my adblock stopped working and i waited for a fix but it didn’t come. It worked fine on chrome.

    I went back to firefox bc my adblock stopped working but it worked fine on firefox.

    these two events are several years apart if that wasn’t clear

  • sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Small suggestion: if you’re over 21 stop blindly doing what others do. Start questioning things and do what you think is best.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    Firefox used to have a “we’re a browser that won’t sell user data” promise. Then they changed their TOS and removed the promise, adding:

    When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox."

    When people reacted to their TOS they said it was an accident, it’s just boilerplate, don’t take it seriously.

    Or in other words: an entity with a team of lawyers claimed ownership of all your data, and then downplayed it, and then has acted good since.

    Personally I stick my head way into the alligators mouth and still use Firefox.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It was too noisy. My wife and I used to live in a small apartment. I’d leave my Linux box on all the time. Running Firefox, it’d periodically spin up the fan, which was loud enough to annoy my wife at night, and me during the day. Chrome didn’t spin up the fan. I switched and we stopped hearing my noisy computer.

    This was a while ago. I can’t remember if it was Firefox or Mozilla at that point.

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The thing is, I never have. Chrome is absolute hot garbage and spyware, all the Chromium forks are all flawed and bugged and still feed into Google’s dominance because of engine and stupid Manifest bullshit. Firefox, despite all the stupid things Mozilla did and still does just works the best and is not Chromium.

      • Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Google sells it as an updated extension framework to improve security, privacy, and performance of extensions… But it also nerfs adblockers ability to block all ads.

        There are some forks from chrome that haven’t implemented the new manifest thing. So if you really need to, look for those.

        • Noerknhar@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Understood, that’s something to be expected by Google, but complete shit.

          However, adblockers still work these days - see Vivaldi, so they found a workaround?

          • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            There is no workaround as most browsers download extensions from Google’s extension repository and they don’t allow extensions that don’t follow their bullshit manifest. Ironically, only Opera has its own extensions repository/store that can do that. Others rely on their own built in adblockers.

        • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It didn’t break adblockers “at the time”. It broke them intentionally. That was by design. Google is an advertising company dabbling in other areas. They don’t want a browser that can properly block their primary revenue.

        • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It was intentional to block/break adblockers. Google is worlds largest advertiser…

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        New Chromium framework for browser extensions that severely limits their functionality. It neuters adlockers.

    • HKPiax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Honestly, as a “non-power” Firefox user, the only issues I’m experiencing is when Google purposely slows down or messes with me simply because I use Firefox (e.g., YouTube).

      • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Dunno, Youtube works fine for me, watching without account. I don’t use anything else from Google, so can’t say if anything else is shit.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That was overblown drama. They didn’t change anything in practice. They clarified things by writing it down. You disable some defaults and have no issue. Even if you don’t, it’s not nearly as bad as other popular platforms.

    I never stopped using Firefox.

    If you want I can look for a comment I made quoting the relevant terms a while back. Or you can look for it yourself.

    Simple forks still depend on upstream. I’d rather support Mozilla than not, given no better sustainable alternative. They do some good stuff like Firefox, Thunderbird, and mdn.