• z500@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like to think of it as a reset to early 2000s internet, which was basically the golden age.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hope you’re right. Everything was a lot more wild. You’d discover a blog through some link and feel like an adventurer explorer a blank part of the map. It was much more fun.

      • Piers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it seems like people made the internet something valuable, a bunch of commercial businesses turned up to take the reins so they could harvest hat value for wealth for investors, it’s reached a point where that juice is no longer worth the squeeze for them and we’ll go back to a phase where the progress and generation of value will revert back to regular people again for a while. Likely that balance will then tip back towards profitability again and the cycle will start anew.

        • brandoncarey@social.vivaldi.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @Piers @z500 I remember in the early days of commercialization of the interwebs, the capitalists just could *not* wrap their heads around the idea of *sharing*. Legalities aside, putting music or art or whatever that you had spent money and time on, and then just… putting it out there for anyone was so foreign to them.

    • 🦊 OneRedFox 🦊@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You know, come to think of it, the internet has been oddly stable for the past decade. Prior to modern social media, sites used to come and go all the time. I had to switch forums twice because the ones I was using shut down. Same for my image hosting sites and flash game sites. We were honestly due for a major shake up.

  • sagacity@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The money ran out, now we have to face cold hard decisions regarding what parts of the internet we are wiling to pay for.

  • Azure@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am going to not be able to find obscure gifs i remember from the 2000’s 😩

  • Pepper@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m gonna take a wild guess and say the reason why gfycat integrated into basically everything was because they launched themselves at the tech giants and gave everything for basically nothing.

    I thought it was pretty suss that they suddenly showed up on every platform.

    • EvilColeslaw@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They were purchased by Snapchat last year. So this is probably Snapchat seeing it as only a cost center with no return. Which tbh, it probably is.

  • bug@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    TIL that Snapchat bought it, any idea why they’re now killing it? The usual reason would be that it contained/owned something they wanted (tech, IP, data, etc) and they didn’t actually care about the service, reckon that’s the case here?

      • MariaTacobellina@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Stolen from another discussion thread: Interest rates are up and quantitative evening is over. For nearly 15 years money was basically free for tech companies. Banks don’t pay anything, bonds don’t pay anything, the stock market is overheated and investors are still looking for return. So if your tech company was already public you could borrow in the form of bank loans or bonds for dirt cheap and if it was still privately held you can get money from individual and corporate investors.

        Now that the free money era is over a lot of companies have had to finally think about making a profit so that they can keep the lights on. This is why there have been tens of thousands laid off in the tech sector in the last year or so.

        As far as Reddit goes I have no idea what they’ve been thinking. It seems like they’ve been spending money developing features nobody wants or needs: locally hosted images and video which have to cost a fortune, live chat, and NFTs, to name a few. They’ve got the ~20th most popular website in the world with millions of daily active users and they can’t figure out how to make it profitable?

        The API the third party applications used doesn’t serve ads. All they had to do for a bump in revenue is to insert ads and require third party applications to display them or risk losing their API access. Users would grumble but it’s a pretty reasonable ask. The fact that they didn’t do this demonstrates to me that they don’t think the money is in serving ads, they think it’s in data mining and they can only get the data they want from the official app.

        • shanghaibebop@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          What I never understood was why not tie API to Reddit premium. Such a simple thing and it would’ve converted a lot of users without all this fuss.

          • can@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because it was about control. They want you on their app where they decide what you see and track how long you see it.