• RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now what’s a shanny?

    a small European blenny (Blennius pholis) that is olive green with irregular dark spots and has no appendages on the head

    Of course it is.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      For those still wondering, a shanny/blenny is a little fish similar to a guppy, known for it’s large eyes, blunt head and inability to acquire a proper-sounding name.

  • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A cornish name of the shanny. Allso bullycod.

    …wha?
    that’s so brittish it isn’t even decipherable written down!

  • Kelly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It looks like DDG is using wordnik as their source for definitions.

    For this word they have four definitions each with a different license:

    1. Formally all rights reserved but now out of copyright and in the public domain
    2. GPL-2 (but based on an out of copyright proprietary dictionary)
    3. CC BY-SA 4.0
    4. Alll rights reserved

    https://www.wordnik.com/words/bully

    Of these licenses the first is the easiest to work with. It comes with the fewest restrictions and transfers the fewest responsibilities to downstream consumers.

    The OP definition is available in context here:

    https://archive.org/details/centurydictipt300whituoft/page/718/mode/2up

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    To me personally duckduckgo is just bing with worse results on top… i never understood how people Can use it.

    It supposedly also ha some level of censorship but thats hard to test.

    There are so many search engines promising to respect privacy, what makes people use this one?

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      DuckDuckGo has a focus on privacy. They don’t track or sell your search data.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s kinda the point for a privacy focused search engine isnt it. How about?

        • StartPage
        • Qwant
        • Swisscows
        • Searx
        • Mojeek
        • Metager

        I didnt check all their details but on premis there the same thing.

        Those that i did test where all consistently better then duck. Except searchx but that depends on the host.

        • CluckN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only difference is DuckDuckGo has an estimated Net Worth of $1 billion and pulls in bills (get it, like a duck).

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        Solving problems that don’t exist, the American Way.

        DuckDuckGo only achieved any meaningful userbase because of QAnon conspiracy theorists and I find it hilarious that anyone would recommend that jank-ass search.

    • XYZinferno@lemmy.basedcount.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I tend to like the “bangs” feature that DuckDuckGo offers when it’s set as my browser’s default. Basically by putting !+prefix it automatically redirects your search to a different website. !g will do Google, !b will do Bing, !yt will do YouTube, etc… And it’s quite extensive. Currently, DDG claims to have 13,564 bangs you can use, so if there’s some website with a search bar, chances are it can be banged from DDG.

      The search engine from my use over the last 4-6 years generally provides me with “good enough” search results and I enjoy the interface itself, as well as the sorting options when searching images. Every now and then, if i don’t get the results I want, I can just bang a different search engine (I’m just starting to realize the repercussions of using “bang” as a verb…).

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think there are browser extensions that offer pretty much the same functionality but it is something.

        I actually found that for me anonymous search result Just kinda suck. When i type [fastfoodbrand] i want the delivery closest to me, not in California or wherever. When i look for a purchase i want web stores that actually deliver where i live.

        As a privacy enthusiast i hate that thats my truth, but the truth it is. But with the downfall of reddit, worsening all Results, most trusted sites being bookmarked and the rise of chatgpt* being just as good if not better then google+reddit. i do find i am way less incline to search the internet at all.

        *Be as critical ofIt as much as your supposed to be online with strangers anyway. Its a tool and only as smart as you are able to prompt It.

        • XYZinferno@lemmy.basedcount.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh yeah, I reckon there’s a good number of extensions for it too, probably something I should check out as well in the future.

          And yeah, it’s definitely a tradeoff of sorts. Denying a browser or search engine access to all personal information, including GPS, might lead to irrelevant results, so I imagine it’s a matter of giving as little information as possible for the maximum relevance in results. GPS is one of those compromises I’ll make as well, though only at the zip code level most of the time, since most apps/sites don’t need to know my precise location.

          While I do try and stick to my trusted sites as much as possible, the things I often want to find online are beyond the scope of the sites I have bookmarked. Though bookmarking more sites that I trust and opting to use them over a regular search seems like a good habit to get into

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For me personally, nothing, apart from “I use it on other devices so I’ll use it here too”.

      Moved from Google to DDG a few years ago, I have no reason really to move to another search as i’m satisfied with duckduckgo, but i’m eyeing Kagi.

      DDG has been fast, responsive, works fine when proxied via a datacenter IP (unlike other services that start throwing capchas at you), looks familiar/like Google to the untrained eye, and image search works as you’d expect. If you’re coming from google, to be honest there’s no reason to pick it specifically, there are a wealth of search engines to choose from.

      Approaching it with google-style searches often yields shit results. My search style adjusted over time, and now I find it much better than Google for my use.

      As a sidenote, I’ve found Searx and Yandex are better for niche/unpopular sites (especially those with user-submitted content), as well as 🚢🏴‍☠️.

      Edit: rephrasing opinions to sound as such

    • nicman24@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      i reminds me of old (00s era) google which is more useful than the current ad riddled eso based google search. especially for niche technical things