• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    From what I call, the advocates kept saying:

    • OnLive was just too soon, the internet needed to be better
    • Google had just so much more resources at their disposal they could make it happen

    Of course, no one ever explained why I would want to pay full price for a game and also have to pay a monthly fee to access it once purchased, which was the most mind boggling facet of Google’s concept to me, even more boggling than trying to make games render server side when the cheapest end user device can just locally render PS3, maybe PS4 level graphics nowadays.