What would be some fact that, while true, could be told in a context or way that is misinfomating or make the other person draw incorrect conclusions?

  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Women have smaller brains than men.

    I mean, yes. Women as a population are physically smaller than men as a population.

    Women have smaller fingers than men. Smaller eyes. Smaller lungs. There is no “gotcha” that smaller skeletal frames with smaller skulls contain, by volume, a smaller organ.

    Doesnt mean every man’s brain is larger than every woman’s brain either.

    Doesn’t mean men are smarter than women.

    It’s just a statistic, that while true, doesn’t imply what some people think it does.

    • ivemadeamoostake@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s actually some historical context for this untrue way of thinking.

      France, 1873 Paul Broca, a French physician, decides to weigh some brains. And women’s brains weighed less than men’s brains. This is part of his research into crainiometry in which the size of the brain is used to understand a mesure of intelligence. Bigger brain weight = more smart.

      We now recognize crainiometry as a pesudoscience.

      Then another French academic Gustav Le Bon uses Broca’s research to further engain that not only are women’s brains small causing them to have the big dumb, women are in fact more similar to gorillas in brain size. Thus, women are uncivilized, akin to children, and MUST be under the care and control of men who are CLEARLY more intelligent with their big brains and, naturally, should control and run society.

      Broca did not take overall body size or age of the specimens into account when originally weighing the brains. The male specimens were younger and larger to the female specimens who were smaller and older. Brains tend to shrink as we age.

      So, not only was this flawed science, based in flawed measurements, thay have been readily disproved, we’re still struggling to undo this as a belief.

      History rant over.

    • Many years ago I worked as an analyst at a small VC firm. My boss, who was a raging misogynist prick and liked to date College freshmen, LOVED this fact (and any other Manosphere bullshit he could find about women being inferior to men). He was such an unbelievable stereotype, he could have stepped out of a sitcom.

      • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I mean, neanderthals had bigger brains than humans, and they were no smarter than we are (as far as we know.)

        Also a blue whale’s brain is four times the size of a human brain and they don’t even know how to drive.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s my pet hypothesis that people are drawn to the comfort of sitcom-level characters because they’re so basic and predictable, even when they’re terrible. Real life is so complicated that black-and-white thinking blasted by people like that is just so low-energy to consume.