The Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal by a group of gun rights advocates seeking to overturn Maryland’s ban on assault-style rifles and high-capacity magazines under the Second Amendment.

The decision, a major win for gun safety advocates, leaves in place a ruling by the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals which ruled that the state may constitutionally prohibit sale and possession of the weapons.

The state legislation, enacted in 2013 after the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting, specifically targets the AR-15 – the most popular rifle in America with 20-30 million in circulation. They are legal in 41 of the 50 states.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Well, it defines assault weapons rather than redefines. As that wasn’t previously any kind of classification of gun. Just a scare term that politicians liked to use similar to “super predator”.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        No, it redefines it. It repeals the old definition and enacts a new definition. That is redefining. Did you read it?

        • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Yeah, but the law you linked only says what it’s modifying. Did the previous law define the term “assault weapon” in Maryland, too?

          • hperrin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Yes. Specifically, assault pistol. This new definition adds assault long gun.

    • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      My reply wasn’t in response to the law, but to the guy claiming that by removing AR-15s you increase the barrier to entry to mass shootings.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        He was talking about the law, which does more than that. I don’t think anyone here is proposing banning one single model.