• lily33@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    after allowing him and his brother, 10, to walk home unaccompanied by an adult from a nearby grocery store.

    Wtf, are kids 10 and 7 not old enough to walk by themselves to the grocery store now?

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Meanwhile all the boomers talk about how they have such find memories of walking around unsupervised until the streetlights came on or whatever lame Facebook nostalgia meme they’re parroting

      • LemmyIsReddit2Point0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        Sorry I’m not following. Are you saying the boomers experienced it and pulled up the ladder like dickheads? Or that anyone who had freedom as a child is a boomer with irresponsible parents? I’m confused.

    • Signtist@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Yeah, I remember when I was 7 I’d explore everywhere around my house for at least a few miles. There was a convenience store 2 miles out where I’d buy candy any time I’d scrounged up a few dollars of change.

      What happened was terrible, but it was an accident nevertheless. Nobody should have to serve time, especially not the grieving parents.

      • chingadera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It’s fucking insane that anyone thought to charge them, let alone actually follow through with it. Multiple people have to have agreed for this to be reality. Another shit stain on humanity

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I think you’re trying to make a pretty s***** implication. Remember that this is a situation where the parents got charged with a crime for being reckless. Are you insinuating that the parents knew that their 7 year old child was likely to jump out into the street, and that perhaps the child had a history of doing so, and that the parents nevertheless allowed the child to walk home from the store? It sounds like that’s what you’re claiming.