This article reads like a one star review of a recipe because someone swapped out all the core ingredients and got mad it didn’t taste good.
I only replaced the sugar with salt and the rice with tuna and it tasted awful. 0/10
deleted by creator
This sounds like a piece written by someone hurt in the place that is highest, when plucking strawberries.
What a whining “opinion”, and opening up for others to whine too…
You know what? Not a single one, can find a browser that does everything you want, the way you want it done, and only that. _Now, grow up, and then start influencing the best browser, who has fought for decades for users rights and privacy. The reason they have to compromise a bit, is because users just don’t care - in general.
someone hurt in the place that is highest, when plucking strawberries.
Ok, I’ve reread this like a hundred times, but I don’t get it. What does this mean LMAO
😅 When you are plucking strawberries, you bend over. Then the highest part of your body is your behind. 😜
FF’s performance on Meta sites in general is terrible. Slow loading at best, other times they don’t load at all. On my Macs, the FirefoxCP RDD process periodically gets into a state where FF stops responding to mouse clicks and has to be force quit. There’s an about:config setting to deal with that but it doesn’t work for me. Frankly, I don’t think cramming in some AI crap is going to fix any of this.
Is it with extensions or without?
Sometimes sites are not happy when blocking ad for instance and don’t load or behave correctly.I’m not a fan of current Mozilla leadership, but the symptoms you’re seeing just sound like shitty Meta programming.
While I’m not arguing with you, opening them in Vivaldi, for instance, is almost instantaneous.
As an alternative, I’ve been using Waterfox.
You should try out Icewombat then.
I thought they still heavily utilized ff code.