• Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Wouldn’t your rule incentivise slower play from the fielding team? I don’t follow baseball, but I imagine the longer an innings goes (in terms of number of plays), the more points the batting team can score. If you can artificially reduce the number of plays because there’s a time limit and you just slow-play it, you gain an advantage.

    Cricket addresses its timing issues through a few means, but one is finding the bowling team if over rates drop too low. This has its own problems (the assumption behind that rule is that low over rates are the fault of the bowling team, but this is not always true, especially with batsmen who have weird habits like regularly changing gloves, and with the use of player reviews), and I think it’s better addressed at more fundamental levels, but I think it probably looks at it from a better place. Identify the culprit and do something that penalises them, rather than their opponent.

    • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Oh, the time might cause slower fielding play, but combined with the “ties are a mutual loss”, you’d have an ongoing scramble to get one over. It makes the whole game more defensive under the time limit.