• Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s a direct correlation. Emissions come from fuel burnt. Less fuel - lower emissions.

        • utopiah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I’m not trying to be sarcastic here, I genuinely do not understand what you are saying. Please give an example and/or a reference, whichever is more convenient.

          • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Sorry, it’s rare people are not asking for trouble here :)

            I mean that any (reasonable) distance travelled at 90km/h will have consumed less fuel than that travelled at 30km/h; given the same car is used, reasonable gear is selected, etc, of course. If there is less fuel consumed, then, naturally, the emissions are lower as well, since that’s just a byproduct of combustion.

            While travelling at 90km/h will consume more fuel per unit of time than at 30km/h, the speed increase makes up for that.