• 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    it is far easier to just shut down local peering center and transit for major providers. far less moving elements to take care of than cell towers, which would not even address the whole problem (“problem” from the government’s point of view)

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      You misunderestood; I guessed that cell towers could be helpful in circumventing such shutdowns. I edited my previous comment to make that a little clearer.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        oh, then i did misunderstood, but i still don’t see what you are suggesting. maybe if you get assigned address you can have some limited p2p communication with nearby people, but if that is the case, a guy with a megaphone does similar job.

          • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            indeed it is. it is not very relevant to our discussion though. it is not a “cell tower” and it needs rather expensive end user hardware. limit of proliferation of such hardware among population during some kind of government internet shutdown will be approaching to zero.

            also, as any kind of radio communication, it can be locally jammed, which further reduces its usability in a crisis.