Alt Text:
Sarcastic bluesky post saying [time traveling back to 1933 to make sure to tell Germans to protest Hitler less vigorously so as not to alienate bougie centrists who want to go to brunch undisturbed, thus preventing the rise of fascism]
Alt Text:
Sarcastic bluesky post saying [time traveling back to 1933 to make sure to tell Germans to protest Hitler less vigorously so as not to alienate bougie centrists who want to go to brunch undisturbed, thus preventing the rise of fascism]
[Time traveling back to summer of 2024 to coddle the sensibilities of “centrists” when pointing out that there was no anti-genocide option on the ballot, and telling them that anti-genocide voters weren’t going to show up for genocide-lite]
Not voting isn’t saying “I don’t like either of these choices”.
It’s saying “I’m happy with either of these choices”.
And in any case, it wasn’t an objection or support of genocide that handed Trump power. It was apathy.
Multiple things handed Trump the presidency, none of them were the only thing, but “protest” non-voters were one of them.
for a “protest no vote” you can at least vote third party.
Hurts the main parties just as much, but they now know there are people willing to vote, just not for genocide.
Exactly, there were two anti war candidates running (Green and Libertarian for if you’re anti war but still hate the poor), but they got a similar number of votes to RFK Jr who had dropped out several months earlier, meaning you’re on par with people who not only wanted RFK to be president, but had also somehow missed the news that he’d joined Trump.
Meanwhile, over 80 million voters stayed at home. That’s more than voted for Harris or Trump.
See UKIP (now Reform) in the UK as an example of how not winning can still get you what you want. They got a bunch of votes (although nowhere near enough to win, or even get any MPs), but they got enough votes to scare one of the main two parties into going along with their scheme in order to get those voters back on side.
Now in this case what they wanted was fucking stupid right wing exceptionalist nonsense (leaving the EU) that neither of the main parties wanted because it was economic suicide, and the only reason Britain didn’t just implode and disappear off the map is because we did it really half arsed, and will hopefully rejoin the EU at some point down the line.
But you could do the same with left wing subjects as well. You just need people to vote for it, to show that they’re willing to fuck your numbers up for what they want.
I always use UKIP/brexit as an example of the power of voting third party.
1% vote increase for a third party is much more significant to the major parties than 1% staying at home and not voting
There’s also the Party for Socialism and Liberation, which is growing rapidly.
for a “protest no vote” you can at least vote third party.
Hurts the main parties just as much, but they now know there are people willing to vote, just not for genocide.
Maybe give a few shooting lessons while you’re there
the one time we wanted a Republican to lean a little more to the right
Lite?
It is a Simpsons reference, replace “Duff” with “genocide”
the simpsons didnt invent the concept of “lite” lol even the spelling can be found as early as the 1960s.
and the question probably wasnt “what does lite mean?”… theyre asking “how tf do you do a ‘lite’ genocide?”
Just a little as a treat