• Eheran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    You save 2 to 3 % on average and up to 7 % in pure city traffic.

    Where are you that red lights are less than 10 seconds? Not many cars are going to get through a green light of below 10 seconds.

    • SippyCup@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      That just isn’t supported by real world data. Manufacturers may claim that but they make a lot of claims that only apply to factory testing conditions.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Real world testing comes to the same conversion. 10 % saving in pure city traffic can be expected.

        Only stopping for 1.5 hours on red lights over 3 years makes you an super extreme outlier. Now you don’t specify the total distance in those 3 years, so perhaps you just don’t drive at all, but realistically people drive something like 10’000 km per year, average speed around 50 km/h, time spent driving about 30’000 km / 50 km/h = 600 h. To only get to 1.5 hours at red lights would mean 10 seconds per hour of driving. I hope that makes it clear how unrealistic YOUR number is.