• Libra00@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re common in the US too in doctors offices and hospitals because of the security requirements of transmitting patient records and such.

      • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        As someone who directly manages faxing in the company i work for, yup! In Healthcare and we send out results to doctors and hospitals through faxing all day every day. We have mostly converted to electronic fax. We still control the servers on prem but the account is linked to a cloud solution so all the faxes are created with the servers and instead of using our own telephony solution like we used to, we send directly over internet to the provider who then sends out to the clients at the last leg. Hundreds of thousands of pages every month. From my understanding, it’s still the easiest solution to get away with not having to implement some new system that will be subjected to audits. Faxes are accepted, and little is required to show for compliance.

        • Libra00@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Interesting, how is eFax any more secure than email? The advantage of fax is it’s one machine to one machine, no possibility of interception without physically tapping the POTS line.

          • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not. Information is secure at rest and encrypted during transfer, but once it reaches the part where it is sent over voip using a telecom provider, it has the same issues as it always did. We use it because its the best way to send this many faxes, as well as automate things using our internal applications to send faxes through it as well as other applications that we leverage its API to use the service. One advantage that makes it semi more secure is if we send a fax to another client that also uses the same service as we are then then it’s actually a secure stream for the entire path.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Legally defined as secure, not actually secure.

        They are fairly insecure in practice, since they are throwing the data at misdialed numbers and they are frequently placed in shared and insecure locations in the building where lots of people can access whatever comes through.

        • BlackVenom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          In the US they cannot be in “insecure locations” legally. And sending HIPAA materials to the wrong number is a reportable offense.

        • Libra00@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure. But as someone who used to work IT with a focus on cybersecurity, physical access to anything trumps everything else, and people who put fax machines in insecure locations will also put email servers or whatever in them. Also throwing data at misdialed numbers is a tiny threat because the odds of transposing a number or whatever and also getting a fax machine are pretty tiny.

          Although the guy above you was just talking about how he works in the industry and they mostly do efax now, which… Iono how that’s supposed to be more secure than just email or whatever. I guess if you’re sending to physical machines it’s more secure on that end, but if the senders are using efax some of the receivers prolly are too, at which point we’ve lost the whole point of using fax machines.

      • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used to work at a retail store not even ten years ago, and we would submit delivery orders via fax. It’s weird until you realize they’re great for reliability and record-keeping. No batteries needed, totally existing infrastructure, kinda fun to use tbh.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair I have infinity more confidence in the system you just described than whatever tech bro disruptor was going to pitch

    • Skunk@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not all of them, most of ATC in EASA airspace is Linux based and use electronic strips instead of the plastic paper strips.

      But the foundation of the ground/ground communication is still AFTN based on x400 network (Europe used to have an X.25 network for its CIDIN communications).

      The latest and newest tech for international data exchange is AMHS based on X400, often it is x400 over IP ok, but still a 50 years or so tech.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fax machines will never die no matter how they are mocked. It simply is the easiest way to send documents with private information and it’s fast. At least we have e-faxing now to receive documents.

  • affenlehrer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of production industry still runs on PLC from the 90s or older and uses DOS supervision systems. They would continue using it but are usually forced to upgrade once they run out of spare parts and / or staff that can maintain it.

    • chonomaiwokurae@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, my most important tool at work is controlled by DOS software running in a 386. Plenty of Windows XP’s around too.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Radio. I still listen to radio over the airwaves, and received by an antenna, as it has been done since 1920.

    Bicycles are not much different since around 1900.

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Car thermostats for the radiator. You don’t want the coolant flowing when the engine first starts, because it will run like shit. So you have a cylinder filled with wax that expands with heat. That controls a valve to set the flow of coolant. Low tech, works fine, no particular reason to change it.