For me its KDE.

  • lippiece@lemmy.sdfeu.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    KDE sets a really high bar with all the packages and extensibility. Almost everything (not including the lesser known and used packages) is feature-packed and just works. I really don’t know any other software that constantly amazes me like KDE.

    • superminerJG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      In addition to that, they make nice FOSS apps that are great for any DE (see Krita, Kdenlive)

      Also it looks like Windows, and that to me is a huge plus for anyone using my computer.

  • SafetyGoggles@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems like I’m the outlier here that prefers Gnome over KDE. Gnome feels more polished than KDE for me. Granted KDE comes with more features out of the box, but I don’t find anything lacking in Gnome for me.

    Tried KDE long time ago to compare it to Gnome 3, went back to Gnome. Tried KDE again a few months ago to compare to Gnome 42, came back to Gnome again.

    I also can’t stand having all my programs’ name starting with K.

    • yarn@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like Gnome the best too. In my experience, it’s the desktop environment that focuses the most on making sure that no little bugs slip in. Like normally when you’re using a desktop environment, it will be good except for a few bugs here and there where you have to remember weird things like not backing out of the settings menu in a certain way in order to not trigger a bug. Gnome seems to have the least amount of weird little bugs like that.

      It’s not very configurable out of the box, but I prefer that too. I’m getting a bit old and set in my ways, and don’t really want to mess around with too much configuration anymore.

    • aksdb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also can’t stand having all my programs’ name starting with K.

      Like Okular, Spectacle, Dolphin, …

      • SafetyGoggles@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe I shouldn’t have said all, but it’s annoying to me when the they put a “k” in the name in a very awkward way just because it’s an KDE app.

    • KingKRool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      KDE was the first one I used after getting more comfortable with Linux and leaving Unity behind. KDE was very customizable and extensible, but when you actually started customizing it quickly became unreliable. I stuck with it for a few years then I tried Elementary next and it was pretty polished but it was limited to a specific distribution. After that I went to GNOME and I’ve been using it for 7 years now. It does need a few extensions, but otherwise I’ve found that it works quite well. I think I’ve also changed, I’m not as interested in things like wobbly windows anymore. I just want the desktop environment to stay out of my way, but I also don’t want it to be too bare bones.

    • AnOrangeBabbler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      KDE has a lot of customization and plenty of neat features, but it suffers a death of a thousand papercuts. There’s just so many small “non-severe” issues that adds up to making it end up feeling clunky and unpolished compared to GNOME’s general polish.

  • slembcke@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Vanilla Gnome. It’s simple/boring, and I like that. It seems like most people that like Gnome don’t care that it’s not a poweruser DE, and aren’t excited to talk about it either.

  • iopq@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use gnome, but it’s basically the worst DE, except all of the other ones that have been tried

    It has the least features, so by default the least bugs.

  • madeindjs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    GNOME, for sure. It works out of the box, and it’s kind of pretty out of the box.

    I also tried it on a touch screen PX and it works surprisingly well.

  • hexloc@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    i3. I mean, it’s fast, customizable, and you can make it look good. That’s all i need.

  • Coyote@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    XFCE, tried cinnamon a couple times it was okay but I just prefer the simplicity and stability of xfce

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        See I don’t really get the appeal of xfce, I kinda see it as the minimal DE you use if you’ve got low powered hardware or if you need a DE on a system that isn’t a personal computer and just need the bare minimum to run a graphical application or two

        • 20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          it’s the quickest fully featured de, and as an added bonus, it’s the least buggy of them all, it’s also very simple in it’s functioning, fairly close to a diy desktop + wm config, so tweaking random stuff like the compositor is easy to do and doesn’t break everything

  • Seperis@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    For aesthetics: Budgie, with Cinnamon a close second For simplicity and speed: XFCE

  • Biscoot@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    KDE. Because it’s mostly a complete package and has tons of knobs and dials to tune for anyone’s needs edited