• WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love it. See how important it is to keep a closed store, for security!

    But honestly no malicious app is probability worse than the genuine article anyway.

    • 50gp@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      it needs apple seal of approval to even exist in their eco, so it must the real deal!

    • Ath47@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there a way to trick the App Store into displaying the wrong age for your app? Because if not, then this app is 4 years old and Meta is actually stealing their name.

      • Kintsugi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        The 4+ age is like for videogames ESRB and PEGI, it’s not the age of how long the app has been in the App Store

          • Kintsugi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The trick is to always look at the update section. If an app has no section, is brand new. Otherwise you can the the 1.0 release along with the year

            • Ath47@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fair enough. I’m surprised there isn’t a more obvious release date on the front section of the App Store. Might be useful to know how long a product has been available.

  • mikkL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    It surprises me how poor people’s technology literacy is, when they see an app with a completely skewed logo and think, “It’s probably the real deal.”

    There really needs to be some form of education in this area…

    • Saneless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ve decided yet another service from Zuck is a good idea. We’re not dealing with geniuses here

      • mikkL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not entirely sure if that’s the case.

        Nevertheless, it would be great if people had better tools to assess whether the “trades” they make with tech giants are as innocent as they think. This requires, for example, a better understanding of the data they are giving away. I think the list of permissions shown on the app store for the legitimate app can be quite abstract for many people. Makes it too too easy to overlook the potential consequences and quickly click download - or accept, like many do with cookies.

  • vaguerant@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Time for somebody to make an EU-exclusive Mastodon instance called realthreads.legit and put it up on app stores. The real way to grow the fediverse in a hurry is to trick people into it. /s

  • Joakim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile, a lot of other apps have “not affiliated with Instagram” as a disclaimer as their first line of the description. I was wondering if Apple requires it or even automated it somehow. Screenshot

  • samokosik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s literally not the official one. At least it collects less data. Anyone has experience with what it does? Just connects to fediverse?