• Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ll probably not use Windows, instead opting for an OS that is proven to work with already running reactors, like QNX

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Modern nuclear reactors are designed to fail safely, so Windows couldn’t actually create a Chernobyl. Everything wrong with nuclear in our world is with old-gen plants. It’s a technology that got ahead of itself by 50 years.

      • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, there’s very little information in the article on what type of reactor they plan to use, but I hope they’re able to go with something like a molten salt reactor with a thorium fuel cycle.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Getting half a dozen of those built and in use would be exactly the kind of thing that tech billionaires are actually good for.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fuck that. Take all the government grants and subsidies that would surely exist, and then use it for their own good/profit/power hoarding? No thanks.

            Putting billionaires in control of our nuclear power infrastructure after “building” them with mostly taxpayer money, when it’s all said and done, is an absolutely bone chilling thought. Terrifying.

            • scarabic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t know why you think government subsidies exist - so impoverished single moms can build power plants? No. They’re pork for billionaires by design, to get them off their asses and steer them into directions we want to go. Like venture capital, they are also high risk. Our federal budget can support some level of this and it’s frankly needed to drive change in new or stalled industries where the motive for immediate profit isn’t strong enough to overcome the cold start problem. If your hatred of billionaires keeps you from making smart energy choices to address climate change, then your priorities are wrong.

        • bemenaker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The picture they show is from terrapower, the company Bill Gates funded, which is a thorium reactor. Thorium liquid salt reactors are still difficult because of the metallurgy. I believe they were supposed to fit the small modular concept though.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hm… risk of nuclear disaster? Or more expense? Hm… I’ll have to think about this one.

          • Anamana@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Hm… invest into your companies cybersecurity before or after you get hacked?

            Companies don’t care enough about risks if they are not forced to account for them.

          • PlexSheep@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Your logic is fallacious: the solution is not to build a nuclear reactor but seek an alternative.

            • scarabic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes I understand. It was a cheeky reply. But alternatives are actually limited if you consider all the benefits of nuclear: high energy output, limited land use, no dependence on weather or time of day, no massive subsidy to Chinese manufacturing, no carbon, all resources mineable in the US, waste all physically contained…

              Got alternatives to that?

              • PlexSheep@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The best alternative is probably a diversified system of sustainable energy sources, along with batteries.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like Microsoft uses Windows for anything that matters since they got rid of Balmer.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of them do IIRC, windows 98 is popping into my mind as an instance I’ve read of

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Reminds me of that time the technodork ran his minecraft reactor with opencomputers and lost his base because the computer blue screened. Almost as funny as that time the entire city lit up because they were using raw radio signals to control their reactor and a nearby thunderstrike instructed the reactor to drop all the fuel and go supercritical. This is why you add realism to video games, it leads to hilarious stuff like this.

      EDIT: That was actually the same server where they sabotaged the entire electrical grid to blow up everyone’s base as a send-off and mine was the only one standing at the end because I was the only one who bothered to set up a surge protector under OHSA (Omega Haxors? Safety!? AHAHAHAH!) it just so happened that the system designed to save the grid from my many exploits just so happened to work in reverse.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Could be worse, could be running MacOS. Surely nothing bad can happen while the entire system freezes for no reason for 15 minutes or more without any possible input from the user. It will always fix it self… (hopefully before the reactor achieves a run away meltdown chain.)