• curiosityLynx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Haven’t seen any indication of it being in danger in Switzerland. But we have proportional voting rather than first past the post and referenda are common.

    • Nighthawk@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was going to say this. The older democratic systems (easily identified by 1st-past-the-post) are falling apart at the seams, but the rest of us is (relatively) fine. Places like the US and UK need to change their system, but politicians have an incentive not to change anything.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Places like the US and UK need to change their system, but politicians have an incentive not to change anything.

        Fortunately with the US, its decentralized system allows experimentation at the state and local level. My city (Portland, OR) just switched to ranked choice voting for city council along with a host of other changes. Voters statewide will soon be able to vote on using RCV for state races. Meanwhile, ranked choice has been implemented in several other states and localities across the country. It will take a while, but I think ranked choice will become the norm within a few decades.

        • Psephomancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately the form of RCV used everywhere in the US is Hare’s method, which eliminates candidates based only on voters’ first-choice rankings, which largely just perpetuates all the same problems as FPTP. There are many other better reforms. One of those should become the norm instead.

      • Spzi@lemmy.click
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        relatively homogenous

        Some may be surprised by the cultural diversity this rather small country packs:

        It has four main linguistic and cultural regions: German, French, Italian and Romansh. Although most Swiss are German-speaking, national identity is fairly cohesive, being rooted in a common historical background, shared values such as federalism and direct democracy,[15][page needed] and Alpine symbolism.[16][17] Swiss identity transcends language, ethnicity, and religion, leading to Switzerland being described as a Willensnation (“nation of volition”) rather than a nation state.[18]

        Due to its linguistic diversity, Switzerland is known by multiple native names: Schweiz [ˈʃvaɪts] (German);[f][g] Suisse [sɥis(ə)] (French); Svizzera [ˈzvittsera] (Italian); and Svizra [ˈʒviːtsrɐ, ˈʒviːtsʁɐ] (Romansh).[h] On coins and stamps, the Latin name, Confoederatio Helvetica — frequently shortened to “Helvetia” — is used instead of the spoken languages.

        I also think the local traditions differentiating down to single villages are more important and alive than in other countries.

        But yes, “national identity is fairly cohesive”, maybe you meant that.