As technology continues to advance, we are rapidly approaching a future where Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and AI glasses will become commonplace. While these advancements have the potential to revolutionize the way we live and work, they also pose a significant threat to our privacy. With the widespread use of AI glasses, everything we see and hear can be recorded and analyzed by powerful AI algorithms. Even seemingly insignificant details can be used to extrapolate a wealth of information about us, from our daily routines to our deepest desires. As AGI becomes more intelligent, Meta and other companies that control these technologies will have unprecedented access to our personal information. They will be able to track our every move, monitor our conversations, and even predict our behavior with alarming accuracy.

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    ? a future where Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and AI glasses will become commonplace.

    You are making definitive statements about things that are simply not true.

    We are no closer to AGI than when AI research started 70 years ago.

    We still do not understand how consciousnesses develops in animals. Until we can do that we have zero chance of recreating it in silicon.

    Everything else that follows is better suited to a SF community…

  • Izzy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not convinced we have even begun to scratch the surface in developing AGI. I’m also not convinced it is even possible using conventional computer hardware.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I for one embrace offline open source LLMs. IMO anyone using proprietary AI is a fool. Sure it may be a little better and easier to get started with, but I have never used it and never will. I can do stuff I never thought possible before. I can’t wait for the improvements that keep coming. If someone is only bright enough to use Windows, how can I fault them. Likewise with AI. If you want to whore absolutely every detail about yourself to these stalkerware companies that is your call. It is about ownership, and that is the real conversation we should all be having. A citizen at the very core is a person with a right to ownership. Proprietary is theft of ownership. Your personal data is a physical part of your person. Collecting and selling that data to attempt to manipulate you is an act of selling part of your person for exploitation. This has world changing long term implications that people are far too stupid to see. This is the turning point for a new age of feudalism. The AI is just a technology that can be used in many ways. It is not the problem. The theft of ownership and enslavement of your digital self is the key issue of our age. This is the end of citizenship and the beginning of the digital dark ages. It will set us back by hundreds of years of progress just like the last dark age when citizens became serfs because of greedy powerful feudal lords. In the next hundreds of years, people will only remember us as the peoples who willingly gave up their right to citizenship and ownership for free e-mail and searches on the internet that followed in a corruption cascade until “they owned nothing and they were happy about it” … until they learned what they really lost and could never get back until millions died to earn it once again.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      What I can run with my hardware just isn’t comparable yet but I fully support the sentiment and plan to switch over once it gets a bit better.

      • j4k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A 70B at ~5bit quantization with GGUF streams at 1-1.5 tokens a second on a 12th gen i7 with a 16GBV 3080Ti and 64GB of system memory. I am running mostly on a gigabyte aorus laptop with those specs. If I could buy again, I would build a dedicated server tower and use a cheap laptop. I ended up using network hosted AI on my other devices a lot more than I expected. Right now, system memory is super important for the larger models. Machines with more CPU cores and at least 96GB of RAM are important. It is possible to use a swap partition on the storage drive. If you can hunt down a workstation with advanced AVX512 support (CPU ISA), that is probably the cheapest way to run really large models as quick as possible without enterprise GPUs and a $8k-$10k setup. I went from 4th gen i7 to 12th back in July. The difference is massive across the board. I would do it again.

        • utopiah@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I already have few RPis at home and a NAS so when I’ll change my desktop my “old” 32Go 2080ti Corsair will go to the basement, headless, and serve models using Dockers and HTTP endpoints, a continuation of https://fabien.benetou.fr/Content/SelfHostingArtificialIntelligence

          Right now to be honest unless there is a desktop VR game that truly needs it, e.g a successor to Half-life: Alyx I’m in no rush. Kind of excited by the project though.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, as somebody working on this I can tell you it’s up to you what you decide to use. Of course you can rely on Meta or Google but there are alternatives like Monocle or Lynx XR with software (not AGI… not even going to address that, assuming it’s a joke) that is also open-source and self-hostable e.g GraphHopper for directions, Mistral or LLaMA for LLMs and countless others.

    So… can you use self hosted AI with open-source hardware today? Yes.

    Will most people decide to do so? Sadly not.

    Are we trapped? Absolutely not, in fact I suggest you help on either or both side, open-hardware, open-source software and open models.

    Please don’t fuel fears.

  • The Doctor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    We are nowhere near close to AGI. We are, however, in a world where humans fail the Turing test more often than software constructs.

  • dislocate_expansion@reddthat.comB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    i can’t tell if you’re trolling… in most countries we don’t have privacy, everything is attached to the cloud and data mined already - unless it’s offline with no input/output that could touch the internet, there is no privacy

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a bit of a shortcut, it’s still up to the services one chose to use. Typically if one does pay for services and it’s GDPR compliant there is a non-zero probability they might not sell your data. So the vast majority for people who do not know or prefer not to care, yes, but everything is misleading IMHO. Better avoid fueling self helplessness. It’s not because it’s not the de facto standard that it’s impossible.

      • dislocate_expansion@reddthat.comB
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        yeah totally, definitely not trying to say it’s a hopeless situation. there are many helpful tools to help with having some. i just have been following and involved with data collection and it’s a bit of a mess - the idea that anything can happen without at least the 13 eyes knowing seems almost impossible