• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Australian plan did take a year, October 1996 to September 1997, and all they got was 650,000 guns which was 20%.

    Americans first, have no obligation to give up their guns thanks to the 2nd Amendment and second, aren’t as likely to give up their guns.

    You aren’t getting 80 million (20%) even in a year, and again, we don’t have the capacity to collect and dispose of them.

    80 million / 50 (yeah, I know, it won’t be an even distribution, but let’s work the math roughly) 1.6 million per state / 12 months = 133,333 a month per state.

    The Australian plan took 12 months to collect 650,000. So the US would need to meet that in about 5 states in one month.

    The most successful gun buyback in US history collected 4,200 guns across 4 buybacks.

    https://www.hcp1.net/GunBuyback

    The Australian plan cannot work here.

    • User_4272894@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, you’re throwing out a lot of numbers claiming it is impossible, but we have logistics and resources that Australia didn’t in 1996. If Amazon can deliver 7.7 billion packages a year, and the US can count 150 million votes in a week during election season, we can figure out how to break down 400 million guns over a month, a year, or a decade. It doesn’t have to happen overnight. The “Australian plan” doesn’t have to work here, but getting guns off the street somehow does.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guarantee you don’t want a private company like Amazon handling gun confiscation, public policy should not be up to private companies to enforce. Might as well ask people to drop off their guns at the local WalMart and ask untrained staff to deal with them. No good will come from it.

        Elections are a different deal because all you’re processing is bits of paper and data, you aren’t running the risk of, you know, explosive ordinance.

        Even if we had the logistics, which we don’t, there’s still the 2nd amendment to contend with. We can’t force people to give up their guns, that’s a right the Australians didn’t have.

        Repealing the 2nd Amendment can be done, but it starts with 290 votes in the House. You did watch the struggle it took to get the 217 they needed to elect their own leader, right?

        • User_4272894@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t suggest Amazon run the process. I just meant “logistics infrastructure exists on a scale unimaginable in 1996”. 600 million COVID doses given out in the US might have been a better comparison. Or 7.2 billion packages by USPS in 2022. There are 708k cops in the US. That’s 2 guns recovered per cop per month to have it done in 90 days.

          There is literally no argument in the world where “the logistics make it impossible” is a reasonable claim.

          Likewise, “we’ll never get 290 votes” is a lazy and cowardly claim. Yes, it’ll be hard. Yes, it’ll be a fight. Yes, we’ll have some minds that will be impossible to change. But your apparent argument in defense of gun rights seems to be “aww, jeez, it seems pretty tricky” which is truly mind boggling to me.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not that it will be hard, it’s that this is the same body that took 22 days to build a simple majority to decide who their own leader is. 290 is out of reach.

            That same speaker, BTW, has already said he won’t allow gun issues to come to the floor.

            The Republicans will not vote for it, which is the majority. Some Democrats won’t vote for it either. It’s a dead issue.