The executive order comes after a series of non-binding agreements with AI companies.

The order has eight goals: to create new standards for AI safety and security, protect privacy, advance equity and civil rights, stand up for consumers, patients, and students, support workers, promote innovation and competition, advance US leadership in AI technologies, and ensure the responsible and effective government use of the technology.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, I’d rather have someone who grew up with some semblance of modern technology be the one at the helm enacted policy relating to it.

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly given the outrage you’re giving in this thread I don’t feel like any regulation would make you happy, regardless of who did it.

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          …outrage?

          You got outrage from an old man emoji?

          That’s on you.

          • AnonTwo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Outrage is doubling down when people gave completely reasonable answers to what you said.

              • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Well if you’re fine with textbook answers, then you’ll be fine with people pointing out, in textbook answer, that the president has no real bearing on this since it’s not being written by him.

                Or if you’re not fine with a textbook answer, then we can circle back to you being outraged for doubling down. Your call 👍

                • foggy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Lol, you keep assigning an emotion to me, which you are incapable of doing. It’s adorable that you’re so persistent.

                  No, I am not outraged at anything here.

                  Hope you have a nice day 😀 🥂

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        American legislative policy affects literally every individual, business, and industry in the country. Do you expect the president to be personally experienced in IT, medicine, law, military operations, transit, construction, manufacturing, agriculture, marketing, finance, distribution, logistics, food service, sales, sports, fire service, flight, and literally every industry that exists in the United States?

      • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not even the problem. He could still make good policies, since he’s not even making them himself. The issue is that they’re apparently non-binding, which means it’s simply a worthless gesture at best.