I mean, there are people who replace their human doctor with Chat GPT to diagnose them due to it being “cheaper than seeing a doctor” but comes with huge caveats (like unverified info, possible hoaxes, misleading tips, AI hallucinations, certain illnesses have multiple stages such as cancer) basically the same crap with “Dr Google” before Gemini existed ("people googling their symptoms relying on search engine to diagnose them).
You must log in or # to comment.
This reads more like “I have an opinion and want to hear people agree with me” than an actual question.
If it is a genuine question then the way it’s framed means you’re less likely for the people who would answer “yes” to actually reply. Well, the ones still able to do so despite the terrible medical advice they’ve been getting, anyway.
I do not use AI in my personal life at all (unless some program I use jams it in somewhere and I haven’t noticed yet to disable it or discontinue use).
If I have medical concerns, I talk to my doctor. If I search anything before/after, I only do so on actual reputable sites (e.g. mayo clinic, etc.)
No.
AI can be superior to medical doctors in some areas when used for the right purposes / prompted in the right way, that’s correct.
But I am not in the position nor competent enough to do either.I do use it to diagnose the symptoms that my house plants show, though.
Waiting for the time AI tells you that you’re fern has chlamydia.
I don’t rely on LLMs/AIs for anything.
