The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoProgrammer tries to explain binary search to the policestartrek.websiteimagemessage-square386fedilinkarrow-up12.27Karrow-down110
arrow-up12.26Karrow-down1imageProgrammer tries to explain binary search to the policestartrek.websiteThe Picard Maneuver@startrek.website to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square386fedilink
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoI’m not lying. I stand by what I’ve said.
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoWow, ok, I guess my next line would be then … NO U!!1!!! We done?
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYour next line can be whatever you want. Including more lying about what you previously said. Nobody’s going to believe it though.
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoHave a nice day.
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoTo each their own. :p
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 year ago That’s not relevant. Relevance is in the eye of the beholder. Or is it “Name checks out”? I’m never quite sure how to end these “who gets the last word” arguments.
I’m not lying. I stand by what I’ve said.
Yes you are.
Wow, ok, I guess my next line would be then …
NO U!!1!!!
We done?
Your next line can be whatever you want. Including more lying about what you previously said.
Nobody’s going to believe it though.
Have a nice day.
Better luck next time.
To each their own. :p
That’s not relevant.
Relevance is in the eye of the beholder. Or is it “Name checks out”?
I’m never quite sure how to end these “who gets the last word” arguments.