• folaht@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Explain how it is reductionist to say that when there’s over 50% of a whole nation that’s in financial woes?
    If anything trying to blame the each individual’s actions is reductionist.
    It paralyzes any political discussion in order to uphold an ever fragile status quo.
    How many more people in your own country need to into debt before
    you start calling it a systemic issue? 80%? 90%? 99%? 99.9%? 99.99%?

    Whatever your solution is going to be, people’s incomes are going to go down,
    as everything is being automated.
    Grocery stores are being automated.
    Fast food chains are being automated.
    Any brick-and-mortar store is disappearing.
    Artists are being replaced

    Your personal anecdote is worthless.
    I delivered magazines, newspapers and mowed lawns when I was a kid.
    Good luck telling the Gen Z that!

    And if you don’t understand why, I’ll try be as reductionist as possible
    in how my (and your) personal anecdote doesn’t work anymore:

    Internet, AI & robots has set up the us the bomb
    All your income are belong to FAANG!!
    You have no chance to survive make your time
    Move Cap Install Com
    For great justice!