For those outside the loop: rsync starting using AI agents to handle the influx of AI security reports to improve the test suite and fix bugs. It introduced a few CVEs and people who never contributed in any way started firing shots at the maintainer.

rsync maintainer’s response to the people getting pissy about his usage of AI: medium and the related post on programming.dev

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Taking a project that works fine and making it actively worse by introducing AI made bugs is imho a valid reason to hard fork. The maintainer might not owe you anything, but it shows very poor judgement to slopify a good project like rsync this way.

    • terabyterex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      how did he slopify anything? he got a huge invtease in contributions and used a tool to help weed out slop.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        They could have just refused merging slop. Rsync didn’t need these “contributions”.