For those outside the loop: rsync starting using AI agents to handle the influx of AI security reports to improve the test suite and fix bugs. It introduced a few CVEs and people who never contributed in any way started firing shots at the maintainer.

rsync maintainer’s response to the people getting pissy about his usage of AI: medium and the related post on programming.dev

  • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    What about the 6 critical security bugs he fixed in that release. Didn’t rsync need those “contributions”?

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The “critical” bugs that I have recently seen being found by AI were all extremely unlikely to be exploitable under realistic assumptions 🤷

          • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I mean the ones in the latest release of rsync, tf does nginx have to do with anything ?

            • poVoq@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I have not looked at the CVEs in Rsync specifically, but given the deludge of “critical” security issue found by AI lately that have been mostly nothing burgers, I am near certain the same applies to those included in that Rsync patchset.

              • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                It must be nice to have technical opinions that don’t need to be grounded in facts. Why would you check your assumptions when you can just vibe.