• pokexpert30@lemmy.pussthecat.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I didnt like very much his video. “You need the terminal to install vlc” wait what ? Ubuntu software library is here…

    Also he says he will migrate to davinci resolve once he needs to, but oh boy I’ve been seeing a lot of videos about resolve on Linux and how painful it is to use (missing codecs, no pipewire support, hates Wayland …)

    • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      To be fair, the paid version of Davinci comes with the missing codecs. It’s only the free version that people have trouble with x264/x265.

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not exactly the typical user here, but honestly Resolve is the best option on Linux. My caveat here is that I run Resolve on my stable box, which is a Debian box, and works beautifully.

      codec support is the issue as a free version, but two things there - if you’re editing, mp4 is generally not what you want anyway, and you can just use ffmpeg (or any variety of tools that use ffmpeg underneath but give you a gui) if you’ve got a file you need that its the only container format.

      If you’re doing it professionally, its $300, and worth buying. Much like buying Reaper for the whopping cost of $60 (personal)/$225 (commercial).

      Regarding Wayland support, I think the first release addressing it was around March or April, and is fully supported in Resolve 19. I haven’t tested, because my Debian Stable box is not using Wayland, so I personally won’t test probably for a few months (or if I get an itch to try it on my 1700x Arch box).

      GPU just needs OpenCL 1.2, so despite some previous snafus (needing nvidia) with GPU, AMD works just fine.