• dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    In general I feel like no one really takes a holistic view of this and just points fingers. If indeed all the models are correct and human-produced CO2 is causing global warming, it’s not “corporations” or “the rich” or just individuals, it’s the whole of the machine of humanity hacking away at the tree branch they’re sitting on, and we need to radically shift our energy production to eliminate greenhouse gas externalities, and ideally figure out, what’s it called, CO2 sequestration or whatever, to bring it back to normal. And to the degree we can’t shift immediately, we shouldn’t just be burning fossil fuels towards ends we don’t even need, like dumb luxury goods or just driving in circles.

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course it is, but consumers generally don’t make the decisions about resource procurement and manufacturing. They only drive the demand. However, demand is also heavily shaped by both the cultural zeitgeist as well as marketing, which is in turn funded by corporations.

      So in effect, it all comes down to corporations.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which should be our government. But we’re too busy trying to prevent fascism and climate change denial as a whole to affect how much we’re doing about climate change.

      We need bigger changes now. For instance, we need to take aggressive military action against anyone burning bunker fuel on the ocean, and that needs to happen soon.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “In general I feel like no one really takes a holistic view of this and everyone just points fingers.”

      That’s odd. Why do you think you feel that way?