Just wondered what people are using for their password management.

I’m currently using 1Password on a family subscription for both password management and 2FA (and then Authy for the 1Password 2FA). But I’m seeing a lot more posters — particularly since joining Lemmy — championing BitWarden (either cloud or self hosted) and Raivo OTP as a cheaper, almost-as-functional alternative.

So is it worth the switch? Will I lose out on anything by doing so?

I’m currently running BitWarden with a free account to see if I can live with it. But I must admit, 1Password is a staple app for me and one that I would say is priceless to my workflow and setup.

Just interested in your thoughts and trying to stimulate conversation!

  • Lunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ive used both, Bitwarden feels more mature plus it’s open source. But 1Password is probably more user friendly for less tech savvy people.

    • schmurnan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks. I’m tech savvy so that’s not a problem. Just always used 1Password based on recommendations. More than happy to go open source, and 1Password 8 feels like a step backwards from 1Password 7.

      • sennmood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just out of curiosity, why exactly is it a step back? I’ve heard this comment several times but, having only used 1Password 8 (which I quite like), I have nothing to compare it to.

        • schmurnan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because it’s now an Electron app on macOS and — in my personal view — Electron apps suck. Much prefer native apps.

          Functionality-wise it’s the same, but just doesn’t feel as nice to use, if that makes sense.

          • sennmood@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair enough, to each their own. I understand why electron apps might not be everyone’s cup of tea, but I think some really do work very well (VSCode is the standout).

            • schmurnan@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Now you may have me there. Visual Studio Code is certainly an exception, I’d be willing to admit.

            • schmurnan@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s personal preference of course. This article may explain it better than I ever could (might not be the best source, was just a quick DDG search).

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’ve never understood those problems. I’m not saying they don’t exist, I haven’t investigated it or anything lol, but I don’t see why individual non-electron programs have less overhead than individual electron programs when the argument is that multiple would-be electron apps could share one browser instance because multiple non-electron apps also don’t share anything.

                Also I don’t see how not using a chromium base would make programs better about having massive 1 GB directories of various temp files.

                What am I missing? Because clearly those problems exist.